PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGP.L vs. AII.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GGP.L vs. AII.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

GGP.L is traded in GBp, while AII.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the AII.TO values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGP.L achieves a 16.92% return, which is significantly lower than AII.TO's 90.62% return. Over the past 10 years, GGP.L has outperformed AII.TO with an annualized return of 59.55%, while AII.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 46.67% annualized return.


GGP.L

1D
-3.71%
1M
-16.85%
YTD
16.92%
6M
16.74%
1Y
84.70%
3Y*
61.76%
5Y*
11.99%
10Y*
59.55%

AII.TO

1D
2.38%
1M
-15.41%
YTD
90.62%
6M
89.66%
1Y
132.35%
3Y*
185.67%
5Y*
68.47%
10Y*
46.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGP.L vs. AII.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGP.L
Greatland Gold plc
16.92%309.83%-35.50%23.25%-50.00%-56.64%1,950.00%-0.55%-3.21%1,000.00%
AII.TO
Almonty Industries Inc.
90.62%760.54%58.08%-22.72%-19.61%40.45%51.50%-35.17%15.48%99.60%

Correlation

The correlation between GGP.L and AII.TO is 0.25, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.25

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2010

0.06

The correlation between GGP.L and AII.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.06 (all time) to 0.25 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GGP.L:

£4.17B

AII.TO:

CA$6.53B

EPS

GGP.L:

£0.47

AII.TO:

-CA$0.50

PS Ratio

GGP.L:

4.45

AII.TO:

125.05

PB Ratio

GGP.L:

4.95

AII.TO:

18.33

Total Revenue (TTM)

GGP.L:

£937.29M

AII.TO:

CA$50.01M

Gross Profit (TTM)

GGP.L:

£483.25M

AII.TO:

CA$14.63M

EBITDA (TTM)

GGP.L:

£477.73M

AII.TO:

-CA$120.84M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGP.L vs. AII.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGP.L
GGP.L Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GGP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
GGP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

AII.TO
AII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
AII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
AII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
AII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
AII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGP.L vs. AII.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) and Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GGP.LAII.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.04

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.26

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.63

2.45

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.65

5.05

+1.59

GGP.L vs. AII.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGP.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.31, which is comparable to the AII.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGP.L and AII.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GGP.L vs. AII.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGP.L drawdown since its inception was -98.49%, which is greater than AII.TO's maximum drawdown of -83.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGP.L and AII.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGP.LAII.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.49%

-83.74%

-14.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-32.07%

-54.32%

+22.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-55.65%

-54.32%

-1.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-76.50%

-62.16%

-14.34%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-86.35%

-68.68%

-17.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-23.29%

-28.01%

+4.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-65.59%

-36.34%

-29.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.70%

26.29%

-13.59%

Volatility

GGP.L vs. AII.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Greatland Gold plc (GGP.L) is 20.24%, while Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) has a volatility of 30.61%. This indicates that GGP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AII.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGP.LAII.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.24%

30.61%

-10.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

44.51%

66.47%

-21.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

64.07%

98.53%

-34.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

65.16%

75.15%

-9.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

90.86%

75.91%

+14.95%

Dividends

GGP.L vs. AII.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither GGP.L nor AII.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GGP.L vs. AII.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Greatland Gold plc and Almonty Industries Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
478.24M
25.40M
(GGP.L) Total Revenue
(AII.TO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GGP.L values in GBP, AII.TO values in CAD

GGP.L vs. AII.TO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Greatland Gold plc and Almonty Industries Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
51.3%
51.2%
Portfolio components
GGP.L - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a gross profit of 245.52M and revenue of 478.24M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.

AII.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Almonty Industries Inc. reported a gross profit of 13.01M and revenue of 25.40M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.2%.

GGP.L - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported an operating income of 236.40M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in an operating margin of 49.4%.

AII.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Almonty Industries Inc. reported an operating income of 2.24M and revenue of 25.40M, resulting in an operating margin of 8.8%.

GGP.L - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Greatland Gold plc reported a net income of 167.80M and revenue of 478.24M, resulting in a net margin of 35.1%.

AII.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Almonty Industries Inc. reported a net income of -5.26M and revenue of 25.40M, resulting in a net margin of -20.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GGP.L and AII.TO have a correlation of 0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGP.L and AII.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer