PortfoliosLab logo
AII.TO vs. RNMBY
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AII.TO and RNMBY is 0.25, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

AII.TO vs. RNMBY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%1,000.00%2,000.00%3,000.00%4,000.00%5,000.00%6,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
79.49%
5,502.16%
AII.TO
RNMBY

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AII.TO:

3.61

RNMBY:

5.24

Sortino Ratio

AII.TO:

4.41

RNMBY:

5.21

Omega Ratio

AII.TO:

1.58

RNMBY:

1.72

Calmar Ratio

AII.TO:

5.31

RNMBY:

13.12

Martin Ratio

AII.TO:

29.91

RNMBY:

31.22

Ulcer Index

AII.TO:

9.51%

RNMBY:

7.35%

Daily Std Dev

AII.TO:

77.56%

RNMBY:

45.89%

Max Drawdown

AII.TO:

-80.14%

RNMBY:

-66.19%

Current Drawdown

AII.TO:

-6.82%

RNMBY:

0.00%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AII.TO:

CA$659.58M

RNMBY:

$77.33B

EPS

AII.TO:

-CA$0.06

RNMBY:

$4.04

PS Ratio

AII.TO:

23.85

RNMBY:

8.28

PB Ratio

AII.TO:

17.60

RNMBY:

17.64

Total Revenue (TTM)

AII.TO:

CA$21.01M

RNMBY:

$8.17B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AII.TO:

CA$1.36M

RNMBY:

$3.42B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AII.TO achieves a 170.33% return, which is significantly lower than RNMBY's 201.69% return. Over the past 10 years, AII.TO has underperformed RNMBY with an annualized return of 15.43%, while RNMBY has yielded a comparatively higher 48.89% annualized return.


AII.TO

YTD

170.33%

1M

23.00%

6M

203.70%

1Y

278.46%

5Y*

36.14%

10Y*

15.43%

RNMBY

YTD

201.69%

1M

33.77%

6M

227.76%

1Y

237.61%

5Y*

101.19%

10Y*

48.89%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AII.TO vs. RNMBY — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AII.TO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AII.TO is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AII.TO is 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AII.TO is 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AII.TO is 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AII.TO is 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AII.TO is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank

RNMBY
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RNMBY is 9999
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RNMBY is 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RNMBY is 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RNMBY is 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RNMBY is 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RNMBY is 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AII.TO vs. RNMBY - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AII.TO Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is lower than the RNMBY Sharpe Ratio of 5.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AII.TO and RNMBY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.005.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
3.42
5.09
AII.TO
RNMBY

Dividends

AII.TO vs. RNMBY - Dividend Comparison

AII.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RNMBY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.32%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AII.TO
Almonty Industries Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.32%
RNMBY
Rheinmetall AG ADR
0.32%0.95%1.48%1.83%2.56%2.43%2.04%2.37%1.21%1.99%0.49%1.25%

Drawdowns

AII.TO vs. RNMBY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AII.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.14%, which is greater than RNMBY's maximum drawdown of -66.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AII.TO and RNMBY. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.44%
0
AII.TO
RNMBY

Volatility

AII.TO vs. RNMBY - Volatility Comparison

Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) has a higher volatility of 24.81% compared to Rheinmetall AG ADR (RNMBY) at 13.63%. This indicates that AII.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RNMBY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%50.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
24.81%
13.63%
AII.TO
RNMBY

Financials

AII.TO vs. RNMBY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Almonty Industries Inc. and Rheinmetall AG ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B3.50BAprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
6.28M
3.48B
(AII.TO) Total Revenue
(RNMBY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. AII.TO values in CAD, RNMBY values in USD

AII.TO vs. RNMBY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Almonty Industries Inc. and Rheinmetall AG ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-20.0%0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%AprilJulyOctober2021AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober
-8.0%
51.3%
(AII.TO) Gross Margin
(RNMBY) Gross Margin
AII.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Almonty Industries Inc. reported a gross profit of -503.00K and revenue of 6.28M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -8.0%.

RNMBY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a gross profit of 1.79B and revenue of 3.48B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.3%.

AII.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Almonty Industries Inc. reported an operating income of -2.64M and revenue of 6.28M, resulting in an operating margin of -42.1%.

RNMBY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported an operating income of 759.00M and revenue of 3.48B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.8%.

AII.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Almonty Industries Inc. reported a net income of -5.40M and revenue of 6.28M, resulting in a net margin of -86.1%.

RNMBY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rheinmetall AG ADR reported a net income of 472.00M and revenue of 3.48B, resulting in a net margin of 13.6%.