PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AII.TO vs. CGG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

AII.TO vs. CGG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. (CGG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

AII.TO vs. CGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
AII.TO
Almonty Industries Inc.
73.24%784.25%68.52%-20.59%-23.60%39.06%52.38%-35.38%18.18%103.70%
CGG.TO
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.
5.58%275.00%33.51%52.96%22.48%94.07%54.24%-25.32%-32.77%18.69%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AII.TO:

CA$5.49B

CGG.TO:

CA$11.56B

EPS

AII.TO:

-CA$0.75

CGG.TO:

CA$1.03

PS Ratio

AII.TO:

139.19

CGG.TO:

9.48

PB Ratio

AII.TO:

15.36

CGG.TO:

5.30

Total Revenue (TTM)

AII.TO:

CA$32.51M

CGG.TO:

CA$1.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AII.TO:

CA$2.38M

CGG.TO:

CA$590.11M

EBITDA (TTM)

AII.TO:

-CA$156.37M

CGG.TO:

CA$761.35M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AII.TO achieves a 73.24% return, which is significantly higher than CGG.TO's 5.58% return. Over the past 10 years, AII.TO has outperformed CGG.TO with an annualized return of 46.32%, while CGG.TO has yielded a comparatively lower 31.99% annualized return.


AII.TO

1D
3.31%
1M
-26.11%
YTD
73.24%
6M
151.32%
1Y
563.81%
3Y*
180.74%
5Y*
68.05%
10Y*
46.32%

CGG.TO

1D
4.03%
1M
-19.63%
YTD
5.58%
6M
14.76%
1Y
201.28%
3Y*
86.16%
5Y*
57.23%
10Y*
31.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AII.TO vs. CGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AII.TO
AII.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
AII.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AII.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
AII.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
AII.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
AII.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

CGG.TO
CGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
CGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AII.TO vs. CGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) and China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. (CGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


AII.TOCGG.TODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

6.28

3.34

+2.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.34

3.24

+1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.54

1.45

+0.10

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

11.94

4.43

+7.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

26.67

14.56

+12.11

AII.TO vs. CGG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AII.TO Sharpe Ratio is 6.28, which is higher than the CGG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 3.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AII.TO and CGG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


AII.TOCGG.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.28

3.34

+2.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.03

1.14

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

0.56

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

0.24

-0.24

Correlation

The correlation between AII.TO and CGG.TO is 0.04, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

AII.TO vs. CGG.TO - Dividend Comparison

AII.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CGG.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.


TTM20252024202320222021
AII.TO
Almonty Industries Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CGG.TO
China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.
0.38%0.40%0.00%8.87%8.06%4.42%

Drawdowns

AII.TO vs. CGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AII.TO drawdown since its inception was -80.14%, smaller than the maximum CGG.TO drawdown of -92.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AII.TO and CGG.TO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


AII.TOCGG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-80.14%

-92.81%

+12.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.53%

-44.05%

+0.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.14%

-47.99%

-18.15%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-68.52%

-87.47%

+18.95%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-31.04%

-32.33%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.31%

-51.53%

+18.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

19.48%

13.39%

+6.09%

Volatility

AII.TO vs. CGG.TO - Volatility Comparison

Almonty Industries Inc. (AII.TO) has a higher volatility of 28.31% compared to China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd. (CGG.TO) at 18.94%. This indicates that AII.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CGG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


AII.TOCGG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

28.31%

18.94%

+9.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

69.24%

44.53%

+24.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

90.86%

60.65%

+30.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

66.70%

50.53%

+16.17%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.73%

57.83%

+14.90%

Financials

AII.TO vs. CGG.TO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Almonty Industries Inc. and China Gold International Resources Corp. Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00M250.00M300.00M350.00MAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober
8.72M
345.03M
(AII.TO) Total Revenue
(CGG.TO) Total Revenue
Values in CAD except per share items