GGIZX vs. GGBZX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

GGIZX (GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund) and GGBZX (GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund) are both mutual funds - GGIZX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by GuideStone Funds, while GGBZX is a Global Equities fund managed by GuideStone Funds. Over the past 10 years, GGIZX returned 6.34%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for GGBZX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GGIZX charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GGBZX.

Performance

GGIZX vs. GGBZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGIZX achieves a 4.85% return, which is significantly lower than GGBZX's 10.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GGIZX has underperformed GGBZX with an annualized return of 6.34%, while GGBZX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.48% annualized return.

GGIZX

• 1D: -0.48%
• 1M: 1.95%
• YTD: 4.85%
• 6M: 5.24%
• 1Y: 13.13%
• 3Y*: 10.82%
• 5Y*: 4.34%
• 10Y*: 6.34%

GGBZX

• 1D: -0.78%
• 1M: 3.90%
• YTD: 10.38%
• 6M: 10.75%
• 1Y: 24.03%
• 3Y*: 18.72%
• 5Y*: 8.70%
• 10Y*: 11.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGIZX vs. GGBZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GGIZX GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund	4.85%	12.49%	8.34%	12.32%	-15.60%	6.94%	10.66%	17.36%	-4.88%	12.31%
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund	10.38%	19.62%	15.45%	20.67%	-19.61%	14.95%	15.47%	26.93%	-10.15%	25.53%

Correlation

The correlation between GGIZX and GGBZX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.94
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002	0.96

The correlation between GGIZX and GGBZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GGIZX vs. GGBZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGIZX

GGIZX Risk / Return Rank: 48
GGIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 48
GGIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
GGIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
GGIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
GGIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 51

GGBZX

GGBZX Risk / Return Rank: 46
GGBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
GGBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 43
GGBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 44
GGBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 43
GGBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGIZX vs. GGBZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) and GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GGIZX	GGBZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.02	1.95	+0.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.92	2.72	+0.20
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.35	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.31	2.45	-0.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.22	10.63	-0.42
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGIZX vs. GGBZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.02, which is comparable to the GGBZX Sharpe Ratio of 1.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGIZX and GGBZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GGIZX	GGBZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.02	1.95	+0.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	0.57	-0.05
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.73	0.70	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.53	0.41	+0.13

Drawdowns

GGIZX vs. GGBZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGIZX drawdown since its inception was -36.00%, smaller than the maximum GGBZX drawdown of -57.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGIZX and GGBZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGIZX	GGBZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.00%	-57.68%	+21.68%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.87%	-10.02%	+4.15%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-7.91%	-16.21%	+8.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.33%	-28.31%	+6.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.33%	-33.03%	+11.70%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.48%	-0.78%	+0.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.39%	-9.23%	+4.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.33%	2.30%	-0.97%

Volatility

GGIZX vs. GGBZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) is 2.26%, while GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) has a volatility of 3.70%. This indicates that GGIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGBZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGIZX	GGBZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.26%	3.70%	-1.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.43%	9.97%	-4.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.72%	12.56%	-5.84%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.40%	15.46%	-7.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.69%	16.46%	-7.77%

GGIZX vs. GGBZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGIZX has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GGBZX's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

GGIZX vs. GGBZX - Dividend Comparison

GGIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.84%, less than GGBZX's 10.48% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGBZX GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund	10.48%	11.57%	3.37%	3.51%	13.16%	7.72%	6.01%	12.14%	3.94%	7.18%	9.55%	27.06%
GGIZX GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund	7.84%	8.22%	4.40%	4.06%	7.00%	5.66%	4.76%	6.52%	4.46%	2.42%	3.23%	16.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGIZX and GGBZX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, GGIZX and GGBZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, GGIZX or GGBZX?

GGBZX has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to GGIZX (2.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGIZX dropped -36.00% vs GGBZX's -57.68%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GGIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.02 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.