PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GGBZX vs. GEMYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GGBZX vs. GEMYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GuideStone Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGBZX achieves a 10.38% return, which is significantly lower than GEMYX's 32.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GGBZX has outperformed GEMYX with an annualized return of 11.48%, while GEMYX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.69% annualized return.


GGBZX

1D
-0.78%
1M
3.90%
YTD
10.38%
6M
10.75%
1Y
24.03%
3Y*
18.72%
5Y*
8.70%
10Y*
11.48%

GEMYX

1D
-1.03%
1M
9.40%
YTD
32.41%
6M
35.90%
1Y
61.53%
3Y*
26.76%
5Y*
8.49%
10Y*
10.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGBZX vs. GEMYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GGBZX
GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund
10.38%19.62%15.45%20.67%-19.61%14.95%15.47%26.93%-10.15%25.53%
GEMYX
GuideStone Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund
32.41%34.83%8.23%11.07%-21.38%-1.90%22.20%20.06%-20.27%35.80%

Correlation

The correlation between GGBZX and GEMYX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.77

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2014

0.77

The correlation between GGBZX and GEMYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.78 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GGBZX vs. GEMYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGBZX
GGBZX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
GGBZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGBZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGBZX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
GGBZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGBZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GEMYX
GEMYX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GEMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
GEMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGBZX vs. GEMYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) and GuideStone Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGBZXGEMYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.62

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.45

4.48

-2.04

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.63

18.19

-7.56

GGBZX vs. GEMYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGBZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the GEMYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGBZX and GEMYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GGBZXGEMYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.95

3.36

-1.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.45

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.70

0.57

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.41

0.37

+0.04

Drawdowns

GGBZX vs. GEMYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGBZX drawdown since its inception was -57.68%, which is greater than GEMYX's maximum drawdown of -40.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGBZX and GEMYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GGBZXGEMYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.68%

-40.68%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.02%

-14.25%

+4.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.21%

-17.49%

+1.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.31%

-38.96%

+10.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.03%

-40.28%

+7.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.78%

-1.03%

+0.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.23%

-16.32%

+7.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.30%

3.50%

-1.20%

Volatility

GGBZX vs. GEMYX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund (GGBZX) is 3.70%, while GuideStone Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMYX) has a volatility of 8.51%. This indicates that GGBZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GEMYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GGBZXGEMYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.70%

8.51%

-4.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.97%

16.48%

-6.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.56%

19.02%

-6.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.46%

19.00%

-3.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.46%

18.79%

-2.33%

GGBZX vs. GEMYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GGBZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than GEMYX's 1.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

GGBZX vs. GEMYX - Dividend Comparison

GGBZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.48%, more than GEMYX's 3.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEMYX
GuideStone Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund
3.00%3.97%1.67%2.17%2.16%13.40%0.97%2.60%0.69%0.96%0.00%0.00%
GGBZX
GuideStone Funds Aggressive Allocation Fund
10.48%11.57%3.37%3.51%13.16%7.72%6.01%12.14%3.94%7.18%9.55%27.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


GGBZX and GEMYX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEMYX has higher volatility (8.51%) compared to GGBZX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGBZX dropped -57.68% vs GEMYX's -40.68%.

GEMYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.36 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GGBZX and GEMYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer