PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEMYX vs. GLDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GEMYX vs. GLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMYX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEMYX achieves a 32.98% return, which is significantly higher than GLDYX's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GEMYX has outperformed GLDYX with an annualized return of 10.65%, while GLDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.


GEMYX

1D
3.15%
1M
7.63%
YTD
32.98%
6M
35.51%
1Y
60.85%
3Y*
25.05%
5Y*
9.28%
10Y*
10.65%

GLDYX

1D
0.08%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.65%
6M
0.88%
1Y
3.74%
3Y*
4.90%
5Y*
2.17%
10Y*
2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEMYX vs. GLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEMYX
GuideStone Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund
32.98%34.83%8.23%11.07%-21.38%-1.90%22.20%20.06%-20.27%35.80%
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
0.65%5.66%4.81%5.09%-4.42%-0.47%3.39%4.00%1.83%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GEMYX and GLDYX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.10

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2014

0.05

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEMYX vs. GLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEMYX
GEMYX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
GEMYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEMYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEMYX Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
GEMYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEMYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDYX
GLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEMYX vs. GLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMYX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GEMYXGLDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.53

1.65

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.23

3.65

+0.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.20

15.17

+1.03

GEMYX vs. GLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEMYX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the GLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEMYX and GLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEMYX vs. GLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEMYX drawdown since its inception was -40.68%, which is greater than GLDYX's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEMYX and GLDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEMYXGLDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.68%

-11.73%

-28.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.25%

-1.04%

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.49%

-1.04%

-16.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.96%

-6.68%

-32.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.28%

-6.68%

-33.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

-0.15%

-0.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-16.28%

-2.15%

-14.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.71%

0.25%

+3.46%

Volatility

GEMYX vs. GLDYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund (GEMYX) has a higher volatility of 11.28% compared to GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) at 0.49%. This indicates that GEMYX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEMYXGLDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.28%

0.49%

+10.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.13%

1.05%

+18.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.28%

1.38%

+19.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.49%

1.83%

+17.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.00%

1.55%

+17.45%

GEMYX vs. GLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GEMYX has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDYX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

GEMYX vs. GLDYX - Dividend Comparison

GEMYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.98%, less than GLDYX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GEMYX
GuideStone Funds Emerging Markets Equity Fund
2.98%3.97%1.67%2.17%2.16%13.40%0.97%2.60%0.69%0.96%0.00%0.00%
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
4.10%4.32%4.31%3.36%1.72%1.02%1.70%2.49%2.87%1.60%1.66%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


GEMYX and GLDYX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEMYX has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to GLDYX (0.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEMYX dropped -40.68% vs GLDYX's -11.73%.

GEMYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.83 vs 2.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEMYX and GLDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer