GGB vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GGB (Gerdau S.A.) is a stock, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 10 years, GGB returned 17.21%/yr vs 15.61%/yr for VOO. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GGB vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGB achieves a 14.50% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return. Over the past 10 years, GGB has outperformed VOO with an annualized return of 17.21%, while VOO has yielded a comparatively lower 15.61% annualized return.

GGB

• 1D: -1.88%
• 1M: -12.21%
• YTD: 14.50%
• 6M: 12.97%
• 1Y: 49.38%
• 3Y*: 2.77%
• 5Y*: 4.46%
• 10Y*: 17.21%

VOO

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.34%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 23.69%
• 3Y*: 20.78%
• 5Y*: 13.13%
• 10Y*: 15.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GGB vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GGB Gerdau S.A.	14.50%	32.78%	-25.80%	-1.92%	28.40%	18.51%	-3.34%	33.07%	2.53%	18.92%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	8.19%	17.82%	24.98%	26.32%	-18.17%	28.79%	18.32%	31.37%	-4.50%	21.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GGB and VOO is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.42
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.39
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 9, 2010	0.44

The correlation between GGB and VOO shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (5 years) to 0.49 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

GGB vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGB

GGB Risk / Return Rank: 77
GGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
GGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
GGB Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
GGB Martin Ratio Rank: 79

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 59
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGB vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GGB	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	1.91	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.07	2.60	-0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.35	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.75	2.67	-0.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.81	11.96	-6.15

GGB vs. VOO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGB Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the VOO Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGB and VOO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GGB vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGB drawdown since its inception was -96.39%, which is greater than VOO's maximum drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGB and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGB	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.39%	-33.99%	-62.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.28%	-8.90%	-19.38%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-51.23%	-18.69%	-32.54%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.23%	-24.52%	-26.71%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.55%	-33.99%	-33.56%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-62.46%	-3.14%	-59.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.32%	-3.68%	-48.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.52%	1.99%	+6.53%

Volatility

GGB vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison

Gerdau S.A. (GGB) has a higher volatility of 13.15% compared to Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO) at 4.83%. This indicates that GGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VOO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGB	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.15%	4.83%	+8.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.65%	9.82%	+16.83%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	33.90%	12.46%	+21.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.05%	16.91%	+22.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	46.76%	18.02%	+28.74%

Dividends

GGB vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

GGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.10%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGB Gerdau S.A.	3.10%	3.05%	5.07%	6.63%	12.79%	11.48%	1.33%	1.48%	1.60%	0.34%	0.38%	4.15%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.05%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GGB and VOO in my portfolio?

GGB and VOO have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GGB or VOO?

GGB has higher volatility (13.15%) compared to VOO (4.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGB dropped -96.39% vs VOO's -33.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VOO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.