GGB vs. OPFI

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and OppFi Inc. (OPFI).

Performance

GGB vs. OPFI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and OppFi Inc. (OPFI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GGB vs. OPFI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GGB Gerdau S.A.	3.27%	32.78%	-25.80%	-1.92%	28.40%	18.51%	18.15%
OPFI OppFi Inc.	-27.53%	40.87%	56.02%	149.76%	-54.85%	-55.40%	3.35%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GGB : $7.49B OPFI : $200.92M
EPS GGB : $0.69 OPFI : $5.50
PE Ratio GGB : 5.46 OPFI : 1.38
PS Ratio GGB : 0.11 OPFI : 0.53
PB Ratio GGB : 0.14 OPFI : 0.65
Total Revenue (TTM) GGB : $69.86B OPFI : $381.18M
Gross Profit (TTM) GGB : $7.97B OPFI : $316.36M
EBITDA (TTM) GGB : $9.29B OPFI : $200.66M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGB achieves a 3.27% return, which is significantly higher than OPFI's -27.53% return.

GGB

• 1D: 4.99%
• 1M: -4.26%
• YTD: 3.27%
• 6M: 22.72%
• 1Y: 34.43%
• 3Y*: 1.96%
• 5Y*: 6.67%
• 10Y*: 14.55%

OPFI

• 1D: -1.69%
• 1M: -16.34%
• YTD: -27.53%
• 6M: -32.32%
• 1Y: -16.19%
• 3Y*: 58.45%
• 5Y*: -4.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GGB vs. OPFI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGB

GGB Risk / Return Rank: 68
GGB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
GGB Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
GGB Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GGB Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
GGB Martin Ratio Rank: 73

OPFI

OPFI Risk / Return Rank: 28
OPFI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
OPFI Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
OPFI Omega Ratio Rank: 27
OPFI Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
OPFI Martin Ratio Rank: 31

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GGB vs. OPFI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and OppFi Inc. (OPFI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GGB	OPFI	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.94	-0.31	+1.25
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	-0.11	+1.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.99	+0.19
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.35	-0.33	+1.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	4.11	-0.58	+4.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GGB vs. OPFI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGB Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is higher than the OPFI Sharpe Ratio of -0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGB and OPFI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GGB	OPFI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94	-0.31	+1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17	-0.06	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.30	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	-0.05	+0.34

Correlation

The correlation between GGB and OPFI is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

GGB vs. OPFI - Dividend Comparison

GGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.02%, less than OPFI's 3.30% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GGB Gerdau S.A.	3.02%	3.05%	5.07%	6.63%	12.79%	11.48%	1.33%	1.48%	1.60%	0.34%	0.38%	4.15%
OPFI OppFi Inc.	3.30%	2.39%	1.57%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

GGB vs. OPFI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGB drawdown since its inception was -96.39%, which is greater than OPFI's maximum drawdown of -84.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGB and OPFI.

Drawdown Indicators

	GGB	OPFI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.39%	-84.60%	-11.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-28.28%	-48.32%	+20.04%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.23%	-84.46%	+33.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-67.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-66.14%	-53.84%	-12.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-52.27%	-51.52%	-0.75%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.29%	27.56%	-18.27%

Volatility

GGB vs. OPFI - Volatility Comparison

Gerdau S.A. (GGB) has a higher volatility of 11.76% compared to OppFi Inc. (OPFI) at 10.23%. This indicates that GGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OPFI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GGB	OPFI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.76%	10.23%	+1.53%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.20%	28.60%	-4.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.87%	52.44%	-15.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	39.18%	67.03%	-27.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.33%	64.93%	-16.60%

Financials