GGB vs. CMC
GGB (Gerdau S.A.) and CMC (Commercial Metals Company) are both stocks. Both operate in the Steel industry within the Basic Materials sector. Over the past 10 years, GGB returned 18.82%/yr vs 18.24%/yr for CMC. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GGB vs. CMC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GGB achieves a 30.42% return, which is significantly higher than CMC's 11.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GGB having a 18.82% annualized return and CMC not far behind at 18.24%.
GGB
- 1D
- -2.86%
- 1M
- 6.37%
- YTD
- 30.42%
- 6M
- 31.14%
- 1Y
- 73.15%
- 3Y*
- 8.73%
- 5Y*
- 6.41%
- 10Y*
- 18.82%
CMC
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 14.20%
- YTD
- 11.26%
- 6M
- 16.93%
- 1Y
- 58.59%
- 3Y*
- 20.45%
- 5Y*
- 20.39%
- 10Y*
- 18.24%
GGB vs. CMC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GGB Gerdau S.A. | 30.42% | 32.78% | -25.80% | -1.92% | 28.40% | 18.51% | -3.34% | 33.07% | 2.53% | 18.92% |
CMC Commercial Metals Company | 11.26% | 41.52% | 0.41% | 4.99% | 35.05% | 79.83% | -5.45% | 42.81% | -23.17% | 0.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between GGB and CMC is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 11, 1999 | 0.46 |
Fundamentals
GGB:
$9.42B
CMC:
$8.58B
GGB:
$0.82
CMC:
$4.50
GGB:
5.78
CMC:
17.03
GGB:
0.14
CMC:
1.03
GGB:
0.18
CMC:
1.95
GGB:
$69.20B
CMC:
$8.39B
GGB:
$8.31B
CMC:
$1.49B
GGB:
$8.02B
CMC:
$905.85M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GGB vs. CMC — Risk / Return Rank
GGB
CMC
GGB vs. CMC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GGB | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.29 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.60 | 1.97 | +0.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.43 | 5.60 | +2.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GGB | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.15 | 1.75 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.17 | 0.58 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.46 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.37 | -0.07 |
Drawdowns
GGB vs. CMC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GGB drawdown since its inception was -96.39%, which is greater than CMC's maximum drawdown of -83.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGB and CMC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GGB | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.39% | -83.77% | -12.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.28% | -29.96% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.23% | -37.63% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.23% | -37.63% | -13.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.55% | -53.78% | -13.77% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -57.24% | -7.67% | -49.57% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -52.32% | -23.53% | -28.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.70% | 10.50% | -1.80% |
Volatility
GGB vs. CMC - Volatility Comparison
Gerdau S.A. (GGB) has a higher volatility of 13.01% compared to Commercial Metals Company (CMC) at 9.30%. This indicates that GGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GGB | CMC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.01% | 9.30% | +3.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.14% | 24.45% | +1.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 34.18% | 33.70% | +0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.98% | 35.51% | +3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.04% | 39.70% | +7.34% |
Dividends
GGB vs. CMC - Dividend Comparison
GGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.72%, more than CMC's 0.97% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMC Commercial Metals Company | 0.97% | 1.04% | 1.41% | 1.28% | 1.20% | 1.38% | 2.34% | 2.16% | 3.00% | 2.25% | 2.20% | 3.51% |
GGB Gerdau S.A. | 2.72% | 3.05% | 5.07% | 6.63% | 12.79% | 11.48% | 1.33% | 1.48% | 1.60% | 0.34% | 0.38% | 4.15% |
Financials
GGB vs. CMC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gerdau S.A. and Commercial Metals Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GGB vs. CMC - Profitability Comparison
GGB - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gerdau S.A. reported a gross profit of 2.29B and revenue of 16.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 13.7%.
CMC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a gross profit of 387.91M and revenue of 2.13B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 18.2%.
GGB - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gerdau S.A. reported an operating income of 1.75B and revenue of 16.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.5%.
CMC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported an operating income of 154.74M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.3%.
GGB - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Gerdau S.A. reported a net income of 1.00B and revenue of 16.72B, resulting in a net margin of 6.0%.
CMC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Commercial Metals Company reported a net income of 93.03M and revenue of 2.13B, resulting in a net margin of 4.4%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GGB and CMC have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GGB has higher volatility (13.01%) compared to CMC (9.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GGB dropped -96.39% vs CMC's -83.77%.
GGB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.75), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GGB and CMC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer