PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GGB vs. CMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GGB and CMC is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

GGB vs. CMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
0.63%
-5.34%
GGB
CMC

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GGB:

-0.51

CMC:

0.10

Sortino Ratio

GGB:

-0.57

CMC:

0.41

Omega Ratio

GGB:

0.94

CMC:

1.05

Calmar Ratio

GGB:

-0.24

CMC:

0.14

Martin Ratio

GGB:

-1.17

CMC:

0.39

Ulcer Index

GGB:

15.08%

CMC:

8.01%

Daily Std Dev

GGB:

34.32%

CMC:

32.50%

Max Drawdown

GGB:

-96.35%

CMC:

-83.77%

Current Drawdown

GGB:

-72.80%

CMC:

-21.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GGB:

$6.74B

CMC:

$6.18B

EPS

GGB:

$0.38

CMC:

$4.14

PE Ratio

GGB:

8.55

CMC:

13.08

PEG Ratio

GGB:

0.00

CMC:

12.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

GGB:

$64.92B

CMC:

$5.92B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GGB:

$8.82B

CMC:

$977.32M

EBITDA (TTM)

GGB:

$9.26B

CMC:

$658.29M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGB achieves a -19.87% return, which is significantly lower than CMC's 0.27% return. Over the past 10 years, GGB has underperformed CMC with an annualized return of 5.63%, while CMC has yielded a comparatively higher 14.53% annualized return.


GGB

YTD

-19.87%

1M

-7.93%

6M

0.63%

1Y

-16.42%

5Y*

4.15%

10Y*

5.63%

CMC

YTD

0.27%

1M

-16.67%

6M

-5.34%

1Y

3.11%

5Y*

19.96%

10Y*

14.53%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GGB vs. CMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GGB, currently valued at -0.51, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.00-0.510.10
The chart of Sortino ratio for GGB, currently valued at -0.57, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.00-0.570.41
The chart of Omega ratio for GGB, currently valued at 0.94, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.941.05
The chart of Calmar ratio for GGB, currently valued at -0.24, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.240.14
The chart of Martin ratio for GGB, currently valued at -1.17, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.00-1.170.39
GGB
CMC

The current GGB Sharpe Ratio is -0.51, which is lower than the CMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGB and CMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.501.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-0.51
0.10
GGB
CMC

Dividends

GGB vs. CMC - Dividend Comparison

GGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than CMC's 1.41% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GGB
Gerdau S.A.
4.68%6.62%12.80%11.50%1.31%1.49%2.77%0.40%0.51%5.67%3.07%1.35%
CMC
Commercial Metals Company
1.41%1.28%1.20%1.38%2.34%2.16%3.00%2.25%2.20%3.51%2.95%2.36%

Drawdowns

GGB vs. CMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGB drawdown since its inception was -96.35%, which is greater than CMC's maximum drawdown of -83.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGB and CMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-72.80%
-21.78%
GGB
CMC

Volatility

GGB vs. CMC - Volatility Comparison

Gerdau S.A. (GGB) has a higher volatility of 10.55% compared to Commercial Metals Company (CMC) at 10.03%. This indicates that GGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%16.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
10.55%
10.03%
GGB
CMC

Financials

GGB vs. CMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gerdau S.A. and Commercial Metals Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab