PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GGB vs. CMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Key characteristics


GGBCMC
YTD Return-13.26%8.01%
1Y Return-4.51%20.27%
3Y Return (Ann)0.47%24.12%
5Y Return (Ann)12.57%27.81%
10Y Return (Ann)1.60%13.55%
Sharpe Ratio-0.160.60
Daily Std Dev31.44%29.41%
Max Drawdown-96.32%-83.77%
Current Drawdown-68.56%-8.68%

Fundamentals


GGBCMC
Market Cap$7.70B$6.39B
EPS$0.68$5.76
PE Ratio5.389.59
PEG Ratio0.0012.25
Revenue (TTM)$68.92B$8.41B
Gross Profit (TTM)$18.75B$1.81B
EBITDA (TTM)$11.64B$1.19B

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.5

The correlation between GGB and CMC is 0.46, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Performance

GGB vs. CMC - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GGB achieves a -13.26% return, which is significantly lower than CMC's 8.01% return. Over the past 10 years, GGB has underperformed CMC with an annualized return of 1.60%, while CMC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.55% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%40.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-1.25%
29.31%
GGB
CMC

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Gerdau S.A.

Commercial Metals Company

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GGB vs. CMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GGB
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GGB, currently valued at -0.16, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.00-0.16
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GGB, currently valued at -0.01, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.01
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GGB, currently valued at 1.00, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.00
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GGB, currently valued at -0.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.07
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GGB, currently valued at -0.25, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.25
CMC
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CMC, currently valued at 0.60, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.60
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CMC, currently valued at 1.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.001.07
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CMC, currently valued at 1.13, compared to the broader market0.501.001.501.13
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CMC, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.000.57
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CMC, currently valued at 1.43, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.001.43

GGB vs. CMC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GGB Sharpe Ratio is -0.16, which is lower than the CMC Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GGB and CMC.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.00NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-0.16
0.60
GGB
CMC

Dividends

GGB vs. CMC - Dividend Comparison

GGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.64%, more than CMC's 1.23% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
GGB
Gerdau S.A.
8.64%7.78%15.16%13.64%1.14%1.30%2.73%0.37%0.43%4.80%2.65%1.38%
CMC
Commercial Metals Company
1.23%1.28%1.20%1.38%2.34%2.16%3.00%2.25%2.20%3.51%2.95%2.36%

Drawdowns

GGB vs. CMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGB drawdown since its inception was -96.32%, which is greater than CMC's maximum drawdown of -83.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGB and CMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-70.00%-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
-68.56%
-8.68%
GGB
CMC

Volatility

GGB vs. CMC - Volatility Comparison

Gerdau S.A. (GGB) has a higher volatility of 10.75% compared to Commercial Metals Company (CMC) at 4.98%. This indicates that GGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2024FebruaryMarchApril
10.75%
4.98%
GGB
CMC

Financials

GGB vs. CMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gerdau S.A. and Commercial Metals Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities



Values in USD except per share items