PortfoliosLab logo
GGB vs. CMC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GGB and CMC is 0.44, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GGB vs. CMC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GGB:

-0.69

CMC:

-0.42

Sortino Ratio

GGB:

-0.63

CMC:

-0.38

Omega Ratio

GGB:

0.93

CMC:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

GGB:

-0.27

CMC:

-0.41

Martin Ratio

GGB:

-1.03

CMC:

-0.88

Ulcer Index

GGB:

20.52%

CMC:

17.71%

Daily Std Dev

GGB:

37.77%

CMC:

38.21%

Max Drawdown

GGB:

-96.35%

CMC:

-83.77%

Current Drawdown

GGB:

-75.01%

CMC:

-23.57%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GGB:

$5.53B

CMC:

$5.43B

EPS

GGB:

$0.28

CMC:

$0.60

PE Ratio

GGB:

9.89

CMC:

80.05

PEG Ratio

GGB:

0.00

CMC:

12.25

PS Ratio

GGB:

0.08

CMC:

0.70

PB Ratio

GGB:

0.56

CMC:

1.35

Total Revenue (TTM)

GGB:

$68.19B

CMC:

$7.74B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GGB:

$8.73B

CMC:

$1.19B

EBITDA (TTM)

GGB:

$8.41B

CMC:

$429.51M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGB achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly higher than CMC's -2.43% return. Over the past 10 years, GGB has underperformed CMC with an annualized return of 6.05%, while CMC has yielded a comparatively higher 13.90% annualized return.


GGB

YTD

-1.06%

1M

12.42%

6M

-16.47%

1Y

-25.70%

5Y*

22.23%

10Y*

6.05%

CMC

YTD

-2.43%

1M

15.20%

6M

-18.46%

1Y

-15.82%

5Y*

28.62%

10Y*

13.90%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GGB vs. CMC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GGB is 2222
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GGB is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GGB is 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GGB is 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GGB is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GGB is 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

CMC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CMC is 2626
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CMC is 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CMC is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CMC is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CMC is 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CMC is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GGB vs. CMC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and Commercial Metals Company (CMC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GGB Sharpe Ratio is -0.69, which is lower than the CMC Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGB and CMC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Dividends

GGB vs. CMC - Dividend Comparison

GGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.78%, more than CMC's 1.50% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GGB
Gerdau S.A.
5.78%4.88%6.62%12.80%11.50%1.31%1.49%2.77%0.40%0.51%5.67%3.07%
CMC
Commercial Metals Company
1.50%1.41%1.28%1.20%1.38%2.34%2.16%3.00%2.25%2.20%3.51%2.95%

Drawdowns

GGB vs. CMC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGB drawdown since its inception was -96.35%, which is greater than CMC's maximum drawdown of -83.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGB and CMC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

GGB vs. CMC - Volatility Comparison

Gerdau S.A. (GGB) has a higher volatility of 8.98% compared to Commercial Metals Company (CMC) at 7.88%. This indicates that GGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GGB vs. CMC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gerdau S.A. and Commercial Metals Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B20212022202320242025
17.38B
1.75B
(GGB) Total Revenue
(CMC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GGB vs. CMC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gerdau S.A. and Commercial Metals Company over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20212022202320242025
11.2%
12.5%
(GGB) Gross Margin
(CMC) Gross Margin
GGB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gerdau S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.95B and revenue of 17.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.2%.

CMC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Commercial Metals Company reported a gross profit of 219.55M and revenue of 1.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.5%.

GGB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gerdau S.A. reported an operating income of 1.38B and revenue of 17.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

CMC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Commercial Metals Company reported an operating income of 51.99M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 3.0%.

GGB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gerdau S.A. reported a net income of 749.49M and revenue of 17.38B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

CMC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Commercial Metals Company reported a net income of 25.47M and revenue of 1.75B, resulting in a net margin of 1.5%.