PortfoliosLab logo
GGB vs. RIO
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GGB and RIO is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GGB vs. RIO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

1,500.00%2,000.00%2,500.00%3,000.00%3,500.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
2,608.33%
1,710.56%
GGB
RIO

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GGB:

-0.76

RIO:

-0.35

Sortino Ratio

GGB:

-1.04

RIO:

-0.40

Omega Ratio

GGB:

0.88

RIO:

0.95

Calmar Ratio

GGB:

-0.37

RIO:

-0.40

Martin Ratio

GGB:

-1.46

RIO:

-0.79

Ulcer Index

GGB:

20.05%

RIO:

12.11%

Daily Std Dev

GGB:

37.64%

RIO:

24.66%

Max Drawdown

GGB:

-96.35%

RIO:

-88.97%

Current Drawdown

GGB:

-77.06%

RIO:

-14.25%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GGB:

$5.30B

RIO:

$97.07B

EPS

GGB:

$0.28

RIO:

$7.07

PE Ratio

GGB:

9.36

RIO:

8.43

PEG Ratio

GGB:

0.00

RIO:

0.00

PS Ratio

GGB:

0.08

RIO:

1.80

PB Ratio

GGB:

0.53

RIO:

1.79

Total Revenue (TTM)

GGB:

$68.19B

RIO:

$53.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GGB:

$8.73B

RIO:

$16.18B

EBITDA (TTM)

GGB:

$8.41B

RIO:

$19.83B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GGB achieves a -9.20% return, which is significantly lower than RIO's 4.30% return. Over the past 10 years, GGB has underperformed RIO with an annualized return of 4.19%, while RIO has yielded a comparatively higher 10.50% annualized return.


GGB

YTD

-9.20%

1M

13.04%

6M

-26.52%

1Y

-28.36%

5Y*

15.75%

10Y*

4.19%

RIO

YTD

4.30%

1M

13.11%

6M

-9.09%

1Y

-8.55%

5Y*

13.73%

10Y*

10.50%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GGB vs. RIO — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GGB
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GGB is 1515
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GGB is 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GGB is 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GGB is 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GGB is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GGB is 99
Martin Ratio Rank

RIO
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of RIO is 2929
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of RIO is 3232
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of RIO is 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of RIO is 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of RIO is 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of RIO is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GGB vs. RIO - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gerdau S.A. (GGB) and Rio Tinto Group (RIO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GGB Sharpe Ratio is -0.76, which is lower than the RIO Sharpe Ratio of -0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GGB and RIO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.500.000.50December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-0.76
-0.35
GGB
RIO

Dividends

GGB vs. RIO - Dividend Comparison

GGB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.46%, less than RIO's 6.79% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GGB
Gerdau S.A.
5.46%4.92%6.62%12.80%11.50%1.31%1.49%2.77%0.40%0.51%5.67%3.07%
RIO
Rio Tinto Group
6.79%7.40%5.40%10.48%14.39%5.13%10.70%6.32%4.45%3.96%7.79%4.46%

Drawdowns

GGB vs. RIO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GGB drawdown since its inception was -96.35%, which is greater than RIO's maximum drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GGB and RIO. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-77.06%
-14.25%
GGB
RIO

Volatility

GGB vs. RIO - Volatility Comparison

Gerdau S.A. (GGB) has a higher volatility of 13.12% compared to Rio Tinto Group (RIO) at 8.97%. This indicates that GGB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RIO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.12%
8.97%
GGB
RIO

Financials

GGB vs. RIO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Gerdau S.A. and Rio Tinto Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B20212022202320242025
17.38B
26.86B
(GGB) Total Revenue
(RIO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GGB vs. RIO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Gerdau S.A. and Rio Tinto Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
11.2%
27.8%
(GGB) Gross Margin
(RIO) Gross Margin
GGB - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gerdau S.A. reported a gross profit of 1.95B and revenue of 17.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.2%.

RIO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rio Tinto Group reported a gross profit of 7.47B and revenue of 26.86B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.8%.

GGB - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gerdau S.A. reported an operating income of 1.38B and revenue of 17.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.0%.

RIO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rio Tinto Group reported an operating income of 7.39B and revenue of 26.86B, resulting in an operating margin of 27.5%.

GGB - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Gerdau S.A. reported a net income of 749.49M and revenue of 17.38B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

RIO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Rio Tinto Group reported a net income of 5.74B and revenue of 26.86B, resulting in a net margin of 21.4%.