GFS vs. SKYT
GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.) and SKYT (SkyWater Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, GFS returned 13.07%/yr vs 64.14%/yr for SKYT. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GFS vs. SKYT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a 138.80% return, which is significantly higher than SKYT's 101.16% return.
GFS
- 1D
- -7.00%
- 1M
- -2.63%
- YTD
- 138.80%
- 6M
- 133.00%
- 1Y
- 119.16%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SKYT
- 1D
- -2.14%
- 1M
- -1.83%
- YTD
- 101.16%
- 6M
- 108.27%
- 1Y
- 302.76%
- 3Y*
- 64.14%
- 5Y*
- 3.52%
- 10Y*
- —
GFS vs. SKYT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 138.80% | -18.62% | -29.19% | 12.45% | -17.05% | 38.23% |
SKYT SkyWater Technology, Inc. | 101.16% | 31.59% | 43.45% | 35.30% | -56.17% | -49.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFS and SKYT is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.48 |
Fundamentals
GFS:
$46.78B
SKYT:
$1.78B
GFS:
$1.39
SKYT:
$2.35
GFS:
59.97
SKYT:
15.56
GFS:
6.82
SKYT:
3.28
GFS:
4.00
SKYT:
9.89
GFS:
$6.84B
SKYT:
$541.53M
GFS:
$1.81B
SKYT:
$106.23M
GFS:
$2.16B
SKYT:
$138.71M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFS vs. SKYT — Risk / Return Rank
GFS
SKYT
GFS vs. SKYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFS | SKYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.93 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.46 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.97 | 7.15 | -2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.53 | 18.81 | -9.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFS vs. SKYT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, smaller than the maximum SKYT drawdown of -86.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and SKYT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFS | SKYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.53% | -86.72% | +25.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -24.10% | -42.64% | +18.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -55.40% | -63.57% | +8.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -86.72% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.30% | -8.47% | +1.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.35% | -59.34% | +24.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.55% | 16.18% | -3.63% |
Volatility
GFS vs. SKYT - Volatility Comparison
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a higher volatility of 23.92% compared to SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) at 15.21%. This indicates that GFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFS | SKYT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.92% | 15.21% | +8.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 46.36% | 43.45% | +2.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 55.07% | 97.32% | -42.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.36% | 96.46% | -45.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.36% | 97.26% | -45.90% |
Dividends
GFS vs. SKYT - Dividend Comparison
Neither GFS nor SKYT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
GFS vs. SKYT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and SkyWater Technology, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFS vs. SKYT - Profitability Comparison
GFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
SKYT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWater Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.15M and revenue of 160.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.
GFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.
SKYT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWater Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.28M and revenue of 160.69M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.3%.
GFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.
SKYT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWater Technology, Inc. reported a net income of -12.31M and revenue of 160.69M, resulting in a net margin of -7.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFS and SKYT have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFS has higher volatility (23.92%) compared to SKYT (15.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFS dropped -61.53% vs SKYT's -86.72%.
SKYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFS and SKYT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer