GFS vs. SKYT

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.) and SKYT (SkyWater Technology, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Semiconductors industry within the Technology sector. Over the past 3 years, GFS returned 12.66%/yr vs 56.71%/yr for SKYT. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

GFS vs. SKYT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a 142.27% return, which is significantly higher than SKYT's 119.77% return.

GFS

• 1D: 5.84%
• 1M: 30.33%
• YTD: 142.27%
• 6M: 127.85%
• 1Y: 135.52%
• 3Y*: 12.66%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SKYT

• 1D: 3.93%
• 1M: 24.76%
• YTD: 119.77%
• 6M: 136.43%
• 1Y: 348.43%
• 3Y*: 56.71%
• 5Y*: 8.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFS vs. SKYT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.	142.27%	-18.62%	-29.19%	12.45%	-17.05%	40.02%
SKYT SkyWater Technology, Inc.	119.77%	31.59%	43.45%	35.30%	-56.17%	-49.39%

Correlation

The correlation between GFS and SKYT is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.47
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021	0.47

Fundamentals

Market Cap GFS : $47.46B SKYT : $1.95B
EPS GFS : $1.39 SKYT : $2.35
PE Ratio GFS : 60.84 SKYT : 17.00
PS Ratio GFS : 6.92 SKYT : 3.58
PB Ratio GFS : 4.06 SKYT : 10.80
Total Revenue (TTM) GFS : $6.84B SKYT : $541.53M
Gross Profit (TTM) GFS : $1.81B SKYT : $106.23M
EBITDA (TTM) GFS : $2.16B SKYT : $138.71M

Return for Risk

GFS vs. SKYT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFS

GFS Risk / Return Rank: 90
GFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
GFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
GFS Omega Ratio Rank: 88
GFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
GFS Martin Ratio Rank: 88

SKYT

SKYT Risk / Return Rank: 95
SKYT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SKYT Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
SKYT Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SKYT Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SKYT Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFS vs. SKYT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GFS	SKYT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.60	3.62	-1.01
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.34	4.07	-0.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.49	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.66	8.01	-2.35
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.05	21.22	-10.16
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GFS vs. SKYT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFS Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the SKYT Sharpe Ratio of 3.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFS and SKYT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GFS	SKYT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.60	3.62	-1.01
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.09	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.18	+0.10

Drawdowns

GFS vs. SKYT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, smaller than the maximum SKYT drawdown of -86.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and SKYT.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFS	SKYT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.53%	-86.72%	+25.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.10%	-42.64%	+18.54%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-55.40%	-63.57%	+8.17%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-86.72%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.96%	0.00%	-5.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.68%	-59.94%	+25.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.33%	16.09%	-3.76%

Volatility

GFS vs. SKYT - Volatility Comparison

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a higher volatility of 24.79% compared to SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) at 10.86%. This indicates that GFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SKYT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFS	SKYT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	24.79%	10.86%	+13.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.15%	47.70%	-4.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.37%	97.15%	-44.78%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	50.96%	96.78%	-45.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	50.96%	97.43%	-46.47%

Dividends

GFS vs. SKYT - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFS nor SKYT has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

GFS vs. SKYT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and SkyWater Technology, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.

SKYT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWater Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.15M and revenue of 160.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.

GFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.

SKYT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWater Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.28M and revenue of 160.69M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.3%.

GFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.

SKYT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWater Technology, Inc. reported a net income of -12.31M and revenue of 160.69M, resulting in a net margin of -7.7%.

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFS and SKYT in my portfolio?

GFS and SKYT have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GFS or SKYT?

GFS has higher volatility (24.79%) compared to SKYT (10.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFS dropped -61.53% vs SKYT's -86.72%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SKYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.62 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.