PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFS vs. S
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

GFS vs. S - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and SentinelOne, Inc. (S). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

GFS vs. S - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
27.38%-18.62%-29.19%12.45%-17.05%40.02%
S
SentinelOne, Inc.
-14.13%-32.43%-19.10%88.07%-71.10%-21.12%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GFS:

$24.95B

S:

$4.31B

EPS

GFS:

$1.58

S:

-$1.36

PS Ratio

GFS:

3.66

S:

4.27

PB Ratio

GFS:

2.09

S:

3.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

GFS:

$6.79B

S:

$1.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GFS:

$1.71B

S:

$742.10M

EBITDA (TTM)

GFS:

$2.18B

S:

-$270.33M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a 27.38% return, which is significantly higher than S's -14.13% return.


GFS

1D
7.49%
1M
-6.46%
YTD
27.38%
6M
24.11%
1Y
20.51%
3Y*
-14.90%
5Y*
10Y*

S

1D
2.14%
1M
-1.83%
YTD
-14.13%
6M
-26.86%
1Y
-29.15%
3Y*
-7.66%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFS vs. S — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFS
GFS Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
GFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFS Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
GFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFS Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

S
S Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
S Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
S Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
S Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
S Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
S Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFS vs. S - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and SentinelOne, Inc. (S). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFSSDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.40

-0.60

+1.00

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.00

-0.63

+1.63

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

0.92

+0.20

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.85

-0.81

+1.66

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.63

-1.56

+3.19

GFS vs. S - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is higher than the S Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFS and S, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFSSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

-0.60

+1.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.02

-0.35

+0.33

Correlation

The correlation between GFS and S is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

GFS vs. S - Dividend Comparison

Neither GFS nor S has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

GFS vs. S - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, smaller than the maximum S drawdown of -83.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and S.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


GFSSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.53%

-83.79%

+22.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.10%

-39.18%

+15.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.65%

-83.12%

+39.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.24%

-65.73%

+30.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.65%

20.26%

-7.61%

Volatility

GFS vs. S - Volatility Comparison

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a higher volatility of 16.70% compared to SentinelOne, Inc. (S) at 15.16%. This indicates that GFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than S based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


GFSSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.70%

15.16%

+1.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.26%

33.91%

+2.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

51.36%

48.63%

+2.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

49.86%

64.07%

-14.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.86%

64.07%

-14.21%

Financials

GFS vs. S - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and SentinelOne, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00BAprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.83B
271.15M
(GFS) Total Revenue
(S) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GFS vs. S - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and SentinelOne, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%AprilJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
28.9%
72.6%
Portfolio components
GFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 528.00M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.

S - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SentinelOne, Inc. reported a gross profit of 196.83M and revenue of 271.15M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 72.6%.

GFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 255.00M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

S - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SentinelOne, Inc. reported an operating income of -79.90M and revenue of 271.15M, resulting in an operating margin of -29.5%.

GFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 199.00M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

S - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, SentinelOne, Inc. reported a net income of -110.23M and revenue of 271.15M, resulting in a net margin of -40.7%.