GFS vs. STM

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM).

Performance

GFS vs. STM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

GFS vs. STM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.	27.38%	-18.62%	-29.19%	12.45%	-17.05%	40.02%
STM STMicroelectronics N.V.	33.57%	5.28%	-49.67%	41.66%	-26.76%	0.89%

Fundamentals

Market Cap GFS : $24.95B STM : $30.75B
EPS GFS : $1.58 STM : $0.28
PE Ratio GFS : 28.10 STM : 123.52
PS Ratio GFS : 3.66 STM : 2.63
PB Ratio GFS : 2.09 STM : 1.72
Total Revenue (TTM) GFS : $6.79B STM : $11.84B
Gross Profit (TTM) GFS : $1.71B STM : $4.01B
EBITDA (TTM) GFS : $2.18B STM : $2.41B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a 27.38% return, which is significantly lower than STM's 33.57% return.

GFS

• 1D: 7.49%
• 1M: -6.46%
• YTD: 27.38%
• 6M: 24.11%
• 1Y: 20.51%
• 3Y*: -14.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

STM

• 1D: 10.31%
• 1M: 3.09%
• YTD: 33.57%
• 6M: 23.02%
• 1Y: 59.31%
• 3Y*: -12.68%
• 5Y*: -1.74%
• 10Y*: 21.41%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

GFS vs. STM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFS

GFS Risk / Return Rank: 58
GFS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
GFS Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
GFS Omega Ratio Rank: 53
GFS Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
GFS Martin Ratio Rank: 59

STM

STM Risk / Return Rank: 74
STM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
STM Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
STM Omega Ratio Rank: 75
STM Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
STM Martin Ratio Rank: 72

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFS vs. STM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GFS	STM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	1.08	-0.68
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.00	1.73	-0.73
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	1.24	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.85	1.59	-0.74
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.63	3.60	-1.98
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GFS vs. STM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFS Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the STM Sharpe Ratio of 1.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFS and STM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GFS	STM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	1.08	-0.68
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.04	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.02	0.20	-0.21

Correlation

The correlation between GFS and STM is 0.62, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

GFS vs. STM - Dividend Comparison

GFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while STM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
STM STMicroelectronics N.V.	1.04%	1.39%	1.32%	0.48%	0.67%	0.45%	0.50%	0.89%	1.73%	0.98%	2.10%	5.11%

Drawdowns

GFS vs. STM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, smaller than the maximum STM drawdown of -94.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and STM.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFS	STM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-61.53%	-94.40%	+32.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.10%	-36.35%	+12.25%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-66.66%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-66.66%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-43.65%	-34.41%	-9.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-35.24%	-55.49%	+20.25%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	12.65%	16.08%	-3.43%

Volatility

GFS vs. STM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) is 16.70%, while STMicroelectronics N.V. (STM) has a volatility of 18.64%. This indicates that GFS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than STM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFS	STM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.70%	18.64%	-1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	36.26%	35.35%	+0.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.36%	55.35%	-3.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	49.86%	43.15%	+6.71%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	49.86%	43.64%	+6.22%

Financials

GFS vs. STM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and STMicroelectronics N.V. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

GFS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 528.00M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 28.9%.

STM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a gross profit of 1.46B and revenue of 3.38B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.3%.

GFS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 255.00M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 13.9%.

STM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported an operating income of 206.85M and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

GFS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 199.00M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.

STM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, STMicroelectronics N.V. reported a net income of -29.98M and revenue of 3.38B, resulting in a net margin of -0.9%.