GFS vs. COST
GFS (GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. GFS operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 3 years, GFS returned -5.19%/yr vs 21.68%/yr for COST. Their 0.26 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GFS vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a 43.42% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 11.13% return.
GFS
- 1D
- 0.04%
- 1M
- -28.39%
- 6M
- 18.73%
- YTD
- 43.42%
- 1Y
- 36.91%
- 3Y*
- -5.19%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 1.34%
COST
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 11.13%
- 1Y
- 0.75%
- 3Y*
- 21.68%
- 5Y*
- 18.27%
- 10Y*
- 21.05%
- ALL TIME*
- 16.99%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $1.88B | $2.07B | $2.36B | |
| $220.58M | $214.32M | $340.43M |
GFS vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 43.42% | -18.62% | -29.19% | 12.45% | -17.05% | 38.23% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 11.13% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 16.26% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFS and COST is -0.08, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2021 | 0.26 |
The correlation between GFS and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.08 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
GFS:
$27.44B
COST:
$423.11B
GFS:
$1.39
COST:
$26.51
GFS:
36.02
COST:
35.99
GFS:
4.10
COST:
1.08
GFS:
$6.84B
COST:
$293.59B
GFS:
$1.81B
COST:
$11.12B
GFS:
$2.16B
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFS vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
GFS
COST
GFS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFS | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.02 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.78 | 0.05 | +0.73 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.88 | 0.10 | +2.79 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFS | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.53% | -53.39% | -8.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.60% | -16.57% | -31.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -51.21% | -20.74% | -30.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -44.33% | -12.68% | -31.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.22% | -13.36% | -20.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.94% | 7.85% | +5.09% |
Volatility
GFS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a higher volatility of 16.86% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 6.76%. This indicates that GFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFS | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.86% | 6.76% | +10.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 49.30% | 15.08% | +34.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.73% | 19.91% | +38.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 51.82% | 22.93% | +28.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.82% | 22.04% | +29.78% |
Dividends
GFS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
GFS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than COST's 0.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.58% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GFS vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GFS vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
GFS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a gross profit of 451.00M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.6%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
GFS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported an operating income of 180.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.0%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
GFS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. reported a net income of 103.00M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 6.3%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GFS and COST have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFS has higher volatility (16.86%) compared to COST (6.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFS dropped -61.53% vs COST's -53.39%.
GFS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs 0.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFS and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer