GFS vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GFS or COST.
Correlation
The correlation between GFS and COST is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
GFS vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GFS:
-0.50
COST:
2.22
GFS:
-0.54
COST:
2.83
GFS:
0.94
COST:
1.39
GFS:
-0.41
COST:
4.23
GFS:
-1.02
COST:
9.85
GFS:
21.80%
COST:
4.41%
GFS:
44.30%
COST:
19.62%
GFS:
-54.38%
COST:
-53.39%
GFS:
-46.25%
COST:
-3.88%
Fundamentals
GFS:
$23.45B
COST:
$459.45B
GFS:
-$0.48
COST:
$16.97
GFS:
0.98
COST:
6.20
GFS:
$4.92B
COST:
$258.81B
GFS:
$1.20B
COST:
$32.80B
GFS:
$1.69B
COST:
$12.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a -1.12% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 13.09% return.
GFS
-1.12%
0.17%
-7.90%
-21.59%
N/A
N/A
COST
13.09%
9.68%
18.01%
41.71%
28.51%
23.68%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GFS vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GFS
COST
GFS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GFS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
GFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.45% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% |
Drawdowns
GFS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -54.38%, roughly equal to the maximum COST drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GFS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 6.09%. This indicates that GFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GFS vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities