GFS vs. COST
Compare and contrast key facts about GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GFS or COST.
Correlation
The correlation between GFS and COST is 0.63, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
GFS vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
GFS:
-0.50
COST:
1.82
GFS:
-0.50
COST:
2.39
GFS:
0.94
COST:
1.33
GFS:
-0.42
COST:
2.32
GFS:
-0.94
COST:
6.89
GFS:
27.13%
COST:
5.83%
GFS:
51.36%
COST:
22.14%
GFS:
-61.53%
COST:
-53.39%
GFS:
-53.89%
COST:
-6.24%
Fundamentals
GFS:
$20.13B
COST:
$443.26B
GFS:
-$0.48
COST:
$17.11
GFS:
0.86
COST:
5.91
GFS:
2.98
COST:
1.67
GFS:
1.87
COST:
17.20
GFS:
$5.20B
COST:
$264.09B
GFS:
$1.26B
COST:
$35.11B
GFS:
$842.00M
COST:
$11.25B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a -15.17% return, which is significantly lower than COST's 10.31% return.
GFS
-15.17%
15.41%
-0.63%
-26.12%
N/A
N/A
COST
10.31%
10.16%
15.21%
36.24%
29.01%
23.67%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GFS vs. COST — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
GFS
COST
GFS vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GFS vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
GFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.47%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFS GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.47% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% | 0.97% |
Drawdowns
GFS vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -61.53%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and COST. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GFS vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a higher volatility of 25.71% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 10.18%. This indicates that GFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
GFS vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities