SKYT vs. COST
SKYT (SkyWater Technology, Inc.) and COST (Costco Wholesale Corporation) are both stocks. SKYT operates in Semiconductors (Technology), while COST operates in Discount Stores (Consumer Defensive). Over the past 5 years, SKYT returned 6.75%/yr vs 21.51%/yr for COST. At a 0.21 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SKYT vs. COST - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKYT achieves a 108.98% return, which is significantly higher than COST's 13.08% return.
SKYT
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 108.98%
- 6M
- 105.36%
- 1Y
- 306.75%
- 3Y*
- 55.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- —
COST
- 1D
- 1.09%
- 1M
- -4.34%
- YTD
- 13.08%
- 6M
- 8.84%
- 1Y
- -7.02%
- 3Y*
- 24.99%
- 5Y*
- 21.51%
- 10Y*
- 22.43%
SKYT vs. COST - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKYT SkyWater Technology, Inc. | 108.98% | 31.59% | 43.45% | 35.30% | -56.17% | -8.57% |
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 13.08% | -5.39% | 39.62% | 49.00% | -19.05% | 52.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKYT and COST is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | 0.21 |
The correlation between SKYT and COST shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
SKYT:
$2.35
COST:
$26.51
SKYT:
16.17
COST:
36.68
SKYT:
3.40
COST:
1.10
SKYT:
$541.53M
COST:
$293.59B
SKYT:
$106.23M
COST:
$11.12B
SKYT:
$138.71M
COST:
$12.48B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKYT vs. COST — Risk / Return Rank
SKYT
COST
SKYT vs. COST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) and Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKYT | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 0.95 | +0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.25 | -0.44 | +7.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.17 | -0.99 | +20.17 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKYT | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | -0.37 | +3.55 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 0.95 | -0.88 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 1.03 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.59 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
SKYT vs. COST - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKYT drawdown since its inception was -86.72%, which is greater than COST's maximum drawdown of -53.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYT and COST.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKYT | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.72% | -53.39% | -33.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.64% | -16.02% | -26.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.57% | -20.74% | -42.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.72% | -31.40% | -55.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.40% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.91% | -11.15% | +6.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.85% | -13.36% | -46.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.10% | 9.60% | +6.50% |
Volatility
SKYT vs. COST - Volatility Comparison
SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) has a higher volatility of 11.68% compared to Costco Wholesale Corporation (COST) at 8.14%. This indicates that SKYT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKYT | COST | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.68% | 8.14% | +3.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.02% | 14.83% | +32.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.25% | 19.15% | +78.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.77% | 22.73% | +74.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.37% | 21.94% | +75.43% |
Dividends
SKYT vs. COST - Dividend Comparison
SKYT has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
COST Costco Wholesale Corporation | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.49% | 2.87% | 0.76% | 0.54% | 3.38% | 0.86% | 1.08% | 4.81% | 1.09% | 4.06% |
SKYT SkyWater Technology, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
SKYT vs. COST - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between SkyWater Technology, Inc. and Costco Wholesale Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
SKYT vs. COST - Profitability Comparison
SKYT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWater Technology, Inc. reported a gross profit of 32.15M and revenue of 160.69M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 20.0%.
COST - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a gross profit of -17.68B and revenue of 70.53B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -25.1%.
SKYT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWater Technology, Inc. reported an operating income of -5.28M and revenue of 160.69M, resulting in an operating margin of -3.3%.
COST - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported an operating income of 2.82B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.0%.
SKYT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, SkyWater Technology, Inc. reported a net income of -12.31M and revenue of 160.69M, resulting in a net margin of -7.7%.
COST - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Costco Wholesale Corporation reported a net income of 2.19B and revenue of 70.53B, resulting in a net margin of 3.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
SKYT and COST have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKYT has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to COST (8.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYT dropped -86.72% vs COST's -53.39%.
SKYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs -0.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKYT and COST
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer