SKYT vs. IAU
SKYT (SkyWater Technology, Inc.) is a stock, while IAU (iShares Gold Trust) is Gold fund tracking the LBMA Gold Price. Over the past 5 years, SKYT returned 6.75%/yr vs 18.52%/yr for IAU. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
SKYT vs. IAU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SKYT achieves a 108.98% return, which is significantly higher than IAU's 3.83% return.
SKYT
- 1D
- -1.09%
- 1M
- 13.52%
- YTD
- 108.98%
- 6M
- 105.36%
- 1Y
- 306.75%
- 3Y*
- 55.36%
- 5Y*
- 6.75%
- 10Y*
- —
IAU
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 3.83%
- 6M
- 6.31%
- 1Y
- 32.47%
- 3Y*
- 31.39%
- 5Y*
- 18.52%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
SKYT vs. IAU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SKYT SkyWater Technology, Inc. | 108.98% | 31.59% | 43.45% | 35.30% | -56.17% | -8.57% |
IAU iShares Gold Trust | 3.83% | 63.95% | 26.85% | 12.84% | -0.63% | 1.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between SKYT and IAU is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | 0.09 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SKYT vs. IAU — Risk / Return Rank
SKYT
IAU
SKYT vs. IAU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) and iShares Gold Trust (IAU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SKYT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | 1.25 | +0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.25 | 1.70 | +5.55 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.17 | 4.18 | +14.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SKYT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18 | 1.24 | +1.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 | 1.04 | -0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.84 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 0.63 | -0.46 |
Drawdowns
SKYT vs. IAU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SKYT drawdown since its inception was -86.72%, which is greater than IAU's maximum drawdown of -45.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SKYT and IAU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SKYT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.72% | -45.14% | -41.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.64% | -19.18% | -23.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -63.57% | -19.18% | -44.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -86.72% | -20.93% | -65.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -21.82% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.91% | -17.02% | +12.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -59.85% | -15.96% | -43.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.10% | 7.79% | +8.31% |
Volatility
SKYT vs. IAU - Volatility Comparison
SkyWater Technology, Inc. (SKYT) has a higher volatility of 11.68% compared to iShares Gold Trust (IAU) at 5.50%. This indicates that SKYT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IAU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SKYT | IAU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.68% | 5.50% | +6.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 47.02% | 23.03% | +23.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.25% | 26.41% | +70.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 96.77% | 17.94% | +78.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 97.37% | 15.90% | +81.47% |
Dividends
SKYT vs. IAU - Dividend Comparison
Neither SKYT nor IAU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
SKYT and IAU have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SKYT has higher volatility (11.68%) compared to IAU (5.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, SKYT dropped -86.72% vs IAU's -45.14%.
SKYT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.18 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for SKYT and IAU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer