PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GFS vs. QQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GFS and QQQ is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.6

Performance

GFS vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.58%
12.16%
GFS
QQQ

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GFS:

-0.36

QQQ:

1.37

Sortino Ratio

GFS:

-0.27

QQQ:

1.86

Omega Ratio

GFS:

0.97

QQQ:

1.25

Calmar Ratio

GFS:

-0.29

QQQ:

1.84

Martin Ratio

GFS:

-0.72

QQQ:

6.35

Ulcer Index

GFS:

21.68%

QQQ:

3.92%

Daily Std Dev

GFS:

44.06%

QQQ:

18.24%

Max Drawdown

GFS:

-54.38%

QQQ:

-82.98%

Current Drawdown

GFS:

-41.99%

QQQ:

0.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFS achieves a 6.71% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 5.53% return.


GFS

YTD

6.71%

1M

6.24%

6M

-0.59%

1Y

-15.98%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

QQQ

YTD

5.53%

1M

3.41%

6M

12.16%

1Y

27.01%

5Y*

19.41%

10Y*

18.38%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GFS vs. QQQ — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GFS is 2727
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GFS is 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GFS is 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GFS is 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GFS is 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GFS is 3030
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQ
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QQQ is 5656
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QQQ is 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QQQ is 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GFS vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) and Invesco QQQ (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GFS, currently valued at -0.36, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.00-0.361.37
The chart of Sortino ratio for GFS, currently valued at -0.27, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.006.00-0.271.86
The chart of Omega ratio for GFS, currently valued at 0.97, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.000.971.25
The chart of Calmar ratio for GFS, currently valued at -0.29, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.00-0.291.84
The chart of Martin ratio for GFS, currently valued at -0.72, compared to the broader market0.0010.0020.0030.00-0.726.35
GFS
QQQ

The current GFS Sharpe Ratio is -0.36, which is lower than the QQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFS and QQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-0.36
1.37
GFS
QQQ

Dividends

GFS vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison

GFS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GFS
GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QQQ
Invesco QQQ
0.53%0.56%0.62%0.80%0.43%0.55%0.74%0.91%0.84%1.06%0.99%1.41%

Drawdowns

GFS vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFS drawdown since its inception was -54.38%, smaller than the maximum QQQ drawdown of -82.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFS and QQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-41.99%
0
GFS
QQQ

Volatility

GFS vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) has a higher volatility of 14.00% compared to Invesco QQQ (QQQ) at 4.69%. This indicates that GFS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%20.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
14.00%
4.69%
GFS
QQQ
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab