GFLW vs. UIVM
GFLW (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF) and UIVM (VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFLW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index, while UIVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GFLW returned 24.12% vs 34.39% for UIVM. Their 0.55 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GFLW charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for UIVM.
Performance
GFLW vs. UIVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GFLW achieves a 18.70% return, which is significantly lower than UIVM's 20.72% return.
GFLW
- 1D
- 3.04%
- 1M
- 1.00%
- 6M
- 22.07%
- YTD
- 18.70%
- 1Y
- 24.12%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 18.30%
UIVM
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 6.00%
- 6M
- 11.69%
- YTD
- 20.72%
- 1Y
- 34.39%
- 3Y*
- 25.73%
- 5Y*
- 13.24%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.56%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $4.89M | $5.71M | $3.71M | |
| $120.04K | $190.76K | $133.22K |
GFLW vs. UIVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 18.70% | 18.40% | -5.88% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 20.72% | 45.47% | -3.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between GFLW and UIVM is 0.60, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.60 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024 | 0.55 |
The correlation between GFLW and UIVM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GFLW vs. UIVM — Risk / Return Rank
GFLW
UIVM
GFLW vs. UIVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) and VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GFLW | UIVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.41 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 3.14 | -1.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.11 | 11.23 | -6.12 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GFLW vs. UIVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFLW drawdown since its inception was -24.14%, smaller than the maximum UIVM drawdown of -42.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFLW and UIVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFLW | UIVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.14% | -42.73% | +18.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.95% | -11.02% | -3.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.50% | 0.00% | -2.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.54% | -9.55% | +5.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.73% | 3.07% | +1.66% |
Volatility
GFLW vs. UIVM - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) has a higher volatility of 6.51% compared to VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF (UIVM) at 3.94%. This indicates that GFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UIVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GFLW | UIVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.51% | 3.94% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.64% | 13.90% | +3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.74% | 15.57% | +6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.91% | 15.58% | +9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.91% | 17.21% | +7.70% |
GFLW vs. UIVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFLW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than UIVM's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
GFLW vs. UIVM - Dividend Comparison
GFLW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UIVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UIVM VictoryShares International Value Momentum ETF | 3.04% | 3.70% | 5.09% | 4.35% | 3.03% | 3.48% | 1.63% | 3.49% | 2.78% | 0.15% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GFLW and UIVM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GFLW has higher volatility (6.51%) compared to UIVM (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFLW dropped -24.14% vs UIVM's -42.73%.
On 1-year performance, UIVM leads with 34.39% vs 24.12% for GFLW. On fees, UIVM is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, UIVM has been the lower-risk option at 3.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, UIVM has performed better with a 34.39% return vs 24.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UIVM is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GFLW.
UIVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.04%, compared with 0.00% for GFLW.
GFLW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while UIVM is Momentum. GFLW tracks Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index, while UIVM tracks Nasdaq Victory International Value Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GFLW and 0.35% for UIVM.
UIVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GFLW and UIVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer