GFLW vs. BBUS

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

GFLW (VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GFLW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index, while BBUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, GFLW returned 28.55% vs 22.78% for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GFLW charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.

Performance

GFLW vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFLW achieves a 15.82% return, which is significantly higher than BBUS's 7.57% return.

GFLW

• 1D: -2.86%
• 1M: 5.19%
• YTD: 15.82%
• 6M: 13.88%
• 1Y: 28.55%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBUS

• 1D: -1.68%
• 1M: -1.53%
• YTD: 7.57%
• 6M: 6.62%
• 1Y: 22.78%
• 3Y*: 20.70%
• 5Y*: 12.52%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFLW vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF	15.82%	18.40%	-5.88%
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF	7.57%	17.77%	-2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between GFLW and BBUS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 4, 2024	0.88

The correlation between GFLW and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GFLW vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFLW

GFLW Risk / Return Rank: 41
GFLW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 42
GFLW Sortino Ratio Rank: 40
GFLW Omega Ratio Rank: 39
GFLW Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
GFLW Martin Ratio Rank: 43

BBUS

BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 56
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 55
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFLW vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GFLW	BBUS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.82	-0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.91	2.48	-0.57
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.33	-0.09
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.92	2.49	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.45	10.97	-4.52

GFLW vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFLW Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFLW and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GFLW vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFLW drawdown since its inception was -24.14%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFLW and BBUS.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFLW	BBUS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.14%	-35.35%	+11.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.95%	-9.21%	-5.74%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.01%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.46%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.86%	-3.47%	+0.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.55%	-5.43%	+0.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.43%	2.08%	+2.35%

Volatility

GFLW vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF (GFLW) has a higher volatility of 9.28% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 5.00%. This indicates that GFLW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFLW	BBUS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.28%	5.00%	+4.28%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.64%	9.95%	+6.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.88%	12.59%	+8.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.08%	17.14%	+7.94%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.08%	19.59%	+5.49%

GFLW vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFLW has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFLW vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

GFLW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than BBUS's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF	1.01%	1.07%	1.21%	1.38%	1.57%	1.11%	1.43%	1.37%
GFLW VictoryShares Free Cash Flow Growth ETF	0.01%	0.02%	0.01%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFLW and BBUS in my portfolio?

GFLW and BBUS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GFLW or BBUS?

GFLW has higher volatility (9.28%) compared to BBUS (5.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFLW dropped -24.14% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

Which ETF is better, GFLW or BBUS?

On 1-year performance, GFLW leads with 28.55% vs 22.78% for BBUS. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 5.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GFLW or BBUS?

Over the 1-year period, GFLW has performed better with a 28.55% return vs 22.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GFLW or BBUS?

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GFLW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GFLW or BBUS?

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.01% for GFLW.

What is the main difference between GFLW and BBUS?

GFLW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while BBUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. GFLW tracks Victory Free Cash Flow Growth Index, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: Victory and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for GFLW and 0.02% for BBUS.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.