PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFIZX vs. GLDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFIZX achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly higher than GLDYX's 0.65% return. Over the past 10 years, GFIZX has outperformed GLDYX with an annualized return of 4.33%, while GLDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.


GFIZX

1D
0.09%
1M
1.82%
YTD
3.08%
6M
3.42%
1Y
9.54%
3Y*
8.13%
5Y*
3.57%
10Y*
4.33%

GLDYX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.23%
YTD
0.65%
6M
1.04%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
4.89%
5Y*
2.13%
10Y*
2.27%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFIZX
GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund
3.08%9.46%6.69%8.80%-10.17%3.82%6.93%10.74%-2.13%7.11%
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
0.65%5.66%4.81%5.09%-4.42%-0.47%3.39%4.00%1.83%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GFIZX and GLDYX is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.46

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.16

Over the past year, GFIZX and GLDYX have become more correlated (0.57) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFIZX vs. GLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFIZX
GFIZX Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GFIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GFIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDYX
GLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
GLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFIZXGLDYXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.19

2.97

-0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.25

4.83

-1.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.71

-0.27

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

3.95

-1.52

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.88

16.50

-5.62

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is comparable to the GLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFIZX and GLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFIZXGLDYXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.19

2.97

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

1.17

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

1.47

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.66

-0.03

Drawdowns

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFIZX drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, which is greater than GLDYX's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFIZX and GLDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFIZXGLDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-11.73%

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.98%

-1.04%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.54%

-1.04%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.03%

-6.68%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.03%

-6.68%

-7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.10%

+0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-2.16%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

0.25%

+0.64%

Volatility

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) at 0.44%. This indicates that GFIZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFIZXGLDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.64%

0.44%

+1.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.63%

1.01%

+2.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.41%

1.38%

+3.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.39%

1.82%

+3.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

1.55%

+3.82%

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFIZX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDYX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Dividend Comparison

GFIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than GLDYX's 4.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFIZX
GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund
5.52%5.69%4.75%3.73%4.69%3.63%2.89%4.47%3.27%1.59%1.17%7.25%
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
4.10%4.32%4.31%3.36%1.72%1.02%1.70%2.49%2.87%1.60%1.66%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


GFIZX and GLDYX have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFIZX has higher volatility (1.64%) compared to GLDYX (0.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFIZX dropped -18.90% vs GLDYX's -11.73%.

GLDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.97 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFIZX and GLDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer