PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFIZX vs. GLDYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFIZX achieves a 2.37% return, which is significantly higher than GLDYX's 0.73% return. Over the past 10 years, GFIZX has outperformed GLDYX with an annualized return of 4.10%, while GLDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.24% annualized return.


GFIZX

1D
0.69%
1M
-0.51%
6M
1.66%
YTD
2.37%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
7.22%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
4.10%
ALL TIME*
3.20%

GLDYX

1D
0.08%
1M
-0.16%
6M
0.48%
YTD
0.73%
1Y
2.83%
3Y*
4.81%
5Y*
2.14%
10Y*
2.24%
ALL TIME*
1.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFIZX
GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund
2.37%9.46%6.69%8.80%-10.17%3.82%6.93%10.74%-2.13%7.11%
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
0.73%5.66%4.81%5.09%-4.42%-0.47%3.39%4.00%1.83%1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GFIZX and GLDYX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.49

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2002

0.16

Over the past year, GFIZX and GLDYX have become more correlated (0.56) than their long-term average of 0.16, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFIZX vs. GLDYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GFIZX
GFIZX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GFIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
GFIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GLDYX
GLDYX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
GLDYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLDYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLDYX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
GLDYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLDYX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GFIZXGLDYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.52

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

3.20

-1.51

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.25

12.48

-5.23

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFIZX Sharpe Ratio is 1.40, which is lower than the GLDYX Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFIZX and GLDYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFIZX drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, which is greater than GLDYX's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFIZX and GLDYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFIZXGLDYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-11.73%

-7.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.98%

-1.04%

-2.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.54%

-1.04%

-4.50%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.03%

-6.68%

-7.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.03%

-6.68%

-7.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.85%

-0.31%

-0.54%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.27%

-2.15%

-0.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

0.27%

+0.66%

Volatility

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) has a higher volatility of 1.50% compared to GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) at 0.51%. This indicates that GFIZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFIZXGLDYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.50%

0.51%

+0.99%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.15%

1.14%

+3.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.82%

1.43%

+3.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.47%

1.84%

+3.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.38%

1.56%

+3.82%

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFIZX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDYX's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFIZX vs. GLDYX - Dividend Comparison

GFIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.56%, more than GLDYX's 3.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFIZX
GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund
5.56%5.69%4.75%3.73%4.69%3.63%2.89%4.47%3.27%1.59%1.17%7.25%
GLDYX
GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund
3.75%4.32%4.31%3.36%1.72%1.02%1.70%2.49%2.87%1.60%1.66%1.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


GFIZX and GLDYX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GFIZX has higher volatility (1.50%) compared to GLDYX (0.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFIZX dropped -18.90% vs GLDYX's -11.73%.

GLDYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFIZX and GLDYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer