GFIZX vs. GGBFX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GFIZX (GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund) and GGBFX (GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - GFIZX is a Diversified Portfolio fund managed by GuideStone Funds, while GGBFX is a Global Bonds fund managed by GuideStone Funds. Over the past 10 years, GFIZX returned 4.33%/yr vs 1.75%/yr for GGBFX. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. GFIZX charges 0.41%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for GGBFX.

Performance

GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFIZX achieves a 3.08% return, which is significantly higher than GGBFX's 0.38% return. Over the past 10 years, GFIZX has outperformed GGBFX with an annualized return of 4.33%, while GGBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.75% annualized return.

GFIZX

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.82%
• YTD: 3.08%
• 6M: 3.42%
• 1Y: 9.54%
• 3Y*: 8.13%
• 5Y*: 3.57%
• 10Y*: 4.33%

GGBFX

• 1D: 0.11%
• 1M: 0.51%
• YTD: 0.38%
• 6M: 0.60%
• 1Y: 4.05%
• 3Y*: 4.38%
• 5Y*: -0.51%
• 10Y*: 1.75%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GFIZX GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund	3.08%	9.46%	6.69%	8.80%	-10.17%	3.82%	6.93%	10.74%	-2.13%	7.11%
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund	0.38%	7.55%	0.40%	5.77%	-13.90%	-2.57%	5.03%	11.04%	-4.74%	7.69%

Correlation

The correlation between GFIZX and GGBFX is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.62
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.61
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2007	0.52

Over the past year, GFIZX and GGBFX have become more correlated (0.74) than their long-term average of 0.52, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

GFIZX vs. GGBFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFIZX

GFIZX Risk / Return Rank: 55
GFIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
GFIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
GFIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
GFIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
GFIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

GGBFX

GGBFX Risk / Return Rank: 12
GGBFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
GGBFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 13
GGBFX Omega Ratio Rank: 12
GGBFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
GGBFX Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	GFIZX	GGBFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.19	0.97	+1.22
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.25	1.43	+1.82
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.17	+0.27
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.43	1.04	+1.39
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.88	3.30	+7.58
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is higher than the GGBFX Sharpe Ratio of 0.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFIZX and GGBFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GFIZX	GGBFX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.19	0.97	+1.22
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.67	-0.10	+0.77
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.39	+0.42
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.63	0.71	-0.07

Drawdowns

GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFIZX drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum GGBFX drawdown of -27.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFIZX and GGBFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	GFIZX	GGBFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.90%	-27.03%	+8.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.98%	-3.80%	-0.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.54%	-6.01%	+0.47%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.03%	-20.84%	+6.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-14.03%	-20.97%	+6.94%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-3.85%	+3.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.28%	-4.64%	+2.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.89%	1.19%	-0.30%

Volatility

GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Volatility Comparison

GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) has a higher volatility of 1.64% compared to GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) at 1.50%. This indicates that GFIZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GFIZX	GGBFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.64%	1.50%	+0.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.63%	3.15%	+0.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.41%	4.07%	+0.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.39%	4.97%	+0.42%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.37%	4.51%	+0.86%

GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFIZX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than GGBFX's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Dividend Comparison

GFIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.52%, more than GGBFX's 3.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GFIZX GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund	5.52%	5.69%	4.75%	3.73%	4.69%	3.63%	2.89%	4.47%	3.27%	1.59%	1.17%	7.25%
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund	3.05%	3.05%	2.88%	1.10%	0.95%	3.55%	1.44%	3.29%	3.13%	3.45%	3.96%	4.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GFIZX and GGBFX in my portfolio?

GFIZX and GGBFX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GFIZX or GGBFX?

GFIZX has higher volatility (1.64%) compared to GGBFX (1.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFIZX dropped -18.90% vs GGBFX's -27.03%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GFIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.