GFIZX vs. GGBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX).
GFIZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001. GGBFX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Dec 28, 2006.
Performance
GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFIZX GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund | -1.32% | 9.46% | 6.69% | 8.80% | -10.17% | 3.82% | 6.93% | 10.74% | -2.13% | 7.11% |
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | -1.33% | 7.55% | 0.40% | 5.77% | -13.90% | -2.57% | 5.03% | 11.04% | -4.74% | 7.69% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GFIZX having a -1.32% return and GGBFX slightly lower at -1.33%. Over the past 10 years, GFIZX has outperformed GGBFX with an annualized return of 4.03%, while GGBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 1.91% annualized return.
GFIZX
- 1D
- 0.90%
- 1M
- -2.52%
- YTD
- -1.32%
- 6M
- -0.16%
- 1Y
- 6.66%
- 3Y*
- 6.81%
- 5Y*
- 2.94%
- 10Y*
- 4.03%
GGBFX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -1.33%
- 6M
- -0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.42%
- 5Y*
- -0.48%
- 10Y*
- 1.91%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GFIZX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is lower than GGBFX's 0.86% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GFIZX vs. GGBFX — Risk / Return Rank
GFIZX
GGBFX
GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GFIZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.36 | 0.98 | +0.38 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.94 | 1.41 | +0.53 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.18 | +0.11 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | 1.06 | +0.68 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.36 | 4.31 | +3.05 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GFIZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.36 | 0.98 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | -0.10 | +0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.43 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.69 | -0.09 |
Correlation
The correlation between GFIZX and GGBFX is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Dividend Comparison
GFIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.77%, more than GGBFX's 3.05% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GFIZX GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund | 5.77% | 5.69% | 4.75% | 3.73% | 4.69% | 3.63% | 2.89% | 4.47% | 3.27% | 1.59% | 1.17% | 7.25% |
GGBFX GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund | 3.05% | 3.05% | 2.88% | 1.10% | 0.95% | 3.55% | 1.44% | 3.29% | 3.13% | 3.45% | 3.96% | 4.01% |
Drawdowns
GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GFIZX drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum GGBFX drawdown of -27.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFIZX and GGBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GFIZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.90% | -27.03% | +8.13% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.98% | -3.80% | -0.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.03% | -20.84% | +6.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -14.03% | -20.97% | +6.94% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.94% | -5.48% | +2.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.29% | -4.64% | +2.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.94% | 0.94% | 0.00% |
Volatility
GFIZX vs. GGBFX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) has a higher volatility of 2.31% compared to GuideStone Funds Global Bond Fund (GGBFX) at 1.76%. This indicates that GFIZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GGBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GFIZX | GGBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.31% | 1.76% | +0.55% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.21% | 2.63% | +0.58% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.05% | 4.00% | +1.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.33% | 4.91% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.34% | 4.49% | +0.85% |