PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GFIZX vs. GGIZX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GFIZX vs. GGIZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GFIZX achieves a 2.72% return, which is significantly lower than GGIZX's 4.85% return. Over the past 10 years, GFIZX has underperformed GGIZX with an annualized return of 4.30%, while GGIZX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.34% annualized return.


GFIZX

1D
-0.34%
1M
1.12%
YTD
2.72%
6M
3.07%
1Y
8.88%
3Y*
8.01%
5Y*
3.43%
10Y*
4.30%

GGIZX

1D
-0.48%
1M
1.95%
YTD
4.85%
6M
5.24%
1Y
13.13%
3Y*
10.82%
5Y*
4.34%
10Y*
6.34%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GFIZX vs. GGIZX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GFIZX
GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund
2.72%9.46%6.69%8.80%-10.17%3.82%6.93%10.74%-2.13%7.11%
GGIZX
GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund
4.85%12.49%8.34%12.32%-15.60%6.94%10.66%17.36%-4.88%12.31%

Correlation

The correlation between GFIZX and GGIZX is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2002

0.96

The correlation between GFIZX and GGIZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GFIZX vs. GGIZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GFIZX
GFIZX Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
GFIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GFIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
GFIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
GFIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GFIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

GGIZX
GGIZX Risk / Return Rank: 4848
Overall Rank
GGIZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GGIZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
GGIZX Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
GGIZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
GGIZX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GFIZX vs. GGIZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) and GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GFIZXGGIZXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.38

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

2.31

+0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.35

10.22

+0.13

GFIZX vs. GGIZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GFIZX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the GGIZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GFIZX and GGIZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GFIZXGGIZXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.08

2.02

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.52

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

0.73

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.53

+0.10

Drawdowns

GFIZX vs. GGIZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GFIZX drawdown since its inception was -18.90%, smaller than the maximum GGIZX drawdown of -36.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GFIZX and GGIZX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GFIZXGGIZXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.90%

-36.00%

+17.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.98%

-5.87%

+1.89%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.54%

-7.91%

+2.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.03%

-21.33%

+7.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.03%

-21.33%

+7.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.34%

-0.48%

+0.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-4.39%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

1.33%

-0.44%

Volatility

GFIZX vs. GGIZX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund (GFIZX) is 1.66%, while GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund (GGIZX) has a volatility of 2.26%. This indicates that GFIZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GGIZX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GFIZXGGIZXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

2.26%

-0.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.64%

5.43%

-1.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.43%

6.72%

-2.29%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.39%

8.40%

-3.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.37%

8.69%

-3.32%

GFIZX vs. GGIZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

GFIZX has a 0.41% expense ratio, which is higher than GGIZX's 0.38% expense ratio.


Dividends

GFIZX vs. GGIZX - Dividend Comparison

GFIZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.54%, less than GGIZX's 7.84% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GFIZX
GuideStone Funds Conservative Allocation Fund
5.54%5.69%4.75%3.73%4.69%3.63%2.89%4.47%3.27%1.59%1.17%7.25%
GGIZX
GuideStone Funds Balanced Allocation Fund
7.84%8.22%4.40%4.06%7.00%5.66%4.76%6.52%4.46%2.42%3.23%16.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, GFIZX and GGIZX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GGIZX has higher volatility (2.26%) compared to GFIZX (1.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GFIZX dropped -18.90% vs GGIZX's -36.00%.

GFIZX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 2.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GFIZX and GGIZX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer