PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEV vs. AFL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GEV vs. AFL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEV achieves a 44.12% return, which is significantly higher than AFL's 7.95% return.


GEV

1D
3.74%
1M
-11.47%
YTD
44.12%
6M
40.23%
1Y
93.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

AFL

1D
1.16%
1M
2.54%
YTD
7.95%
6M
8.17%
1Y
17.23%
3Y*
21.87%
5Y*
18.60%
10Y*
15.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEV vs. AFL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
44.12%99.02%186.24%
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
7.95%8.94%23.61%

Correlation

The correlation between GEV and AFL is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2024

0.08

The correlation between GEV and AFL shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.08 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GEV:

$255.86B

AFL:

$60.64B

EPS

GEV:

$34.12

AFL:

$8.76

PE Ratio

GEV:

27.57

AFL:

13.45

PEG Ratio

GEV:

0.13

AFL:

3.49

PS Ratio

GEV:

6.56

AFL:

3.42

PB Ratio

GEV:

18.38

AFL:

2.70

Total Revenue (TTM)

GEV:

$39.38B

AFL:

$18.22B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GEV:

$7.85B

AFL:

$8.70B

EBITDA (TTM)

GEV:

$3.32B

AFL:

$6.67B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEV vs. AFL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEV
GEV Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
GEV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEV Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
GEV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEV Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

AFL
AFL Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
AFL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AFL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
AFL Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
AFL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
AFL Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEV vs. AFL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) and Aflac Incorporated (AFL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GEVAFLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.18

+0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

1.90

+1.92

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.27

4.72

+6.55

GEV vs. AFL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEV Sharpe Ratio is 1.91, which is higher than the AFL Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEV and AFL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEV vs. AFL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEV drawdown since its inception was -38.29%, smaller than the maximum AFL drawdown of -82.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEV and AFL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEVAFLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.29%

-82.71%

+44.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-24.57%

-9.11%

-15.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.86%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-54.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.17%

-0.37%

-17.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.99%

-11.65%

+4.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.31%

3.66%

+4.65%

Volatility

GEV vs. AFL - Volatility Comparison

GE Vernova Inc. (GEV) has a higher volatility of 13.17% compared to Aflac Incorporated (AFL) at 5.65%. This indicates that GEV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AFL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEVAFLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.17%

5.65%

+7.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.45%

12.28%

+22.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

49.09%

17.07%

+32.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

53.62%

20.93%

+32.69%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

53.62%

25.76%

+27.86%

Dividends

GEV vs. AFL - Dividend Comparison

GEV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than AFL's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
2.02%2.10%1.93%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%
GEV
GE Vernova Inc.
0.16%0.11%0.08%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GEV vs. AFL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between GE Vernova Inc. and Aflac Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
9.34B
4.32B
(GEV) Total Revenue
(AFL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GEV vs. AFL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between GE Vernova Inc. and Aflac Incorporated over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%100.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
19.1%
57.5%
Portfolio components
GEV - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GE Vernova Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.78B and revenue of 9.34B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.1%.

AFL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of 2.48B and revenue of 4.32B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 57.5%.

GEV - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GE Vernova Inc. reported an operating income of 179.00M and revenue of 9.34B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.9%.

AFL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 1.23B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.4%.

GEV - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, GE Vernova Inc. reported a net income of 4.75B and revenue of 9.34B, resulting in a net margin of 50.8%.

AFL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 4.32B, resulting in a net margin of 23.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GEV and AFL have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEV has higher volatility (13.17%) compared to AFL (5.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEV dropped -38.29% vs AFL's -82.71%.

GEV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEV and AFL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer