AFL vs. PGR
Compare and contrast key facts about Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AFL or PGR.
Correlation
The correlation between AFL and PGR is 0.38, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AFL vs. PGR - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AFL:
1.45
PGR:
2.68
AFL:
1.83
PGR:
3.73
AFL:
1.30
PGR:
1.47
AFL:
2.39
PGR:
5.09
AFL:
7.61
PGR:
18.11
AFL:
3.94%
PGR:
3.05%
AFL:
20.63%
PGR:
20.65%
AFL:
-82.71%
PGR:
-71.05%
AFL:
-10.50%
PGR:
-10.75%
Fundamentals
AFL:
$57.08B
PGR:
$145.01B
AFL:
$6.73
PGR:
$13.76
AFL:
15.27
PGR:
17.99
AFL:
0.93
PGR:
1.00
AFL:
$17.30B
PGR:
$71.60B
AFL:
$17.30B
PGR:
$71.59B
AFL:
$382.00M
PGR:
$10.67B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFL achieves a 27.16% return, which is significantly lower than PGR's 51.62% return. Over the past 10 years, AFL has underperformed PGR with an annualized return of 15.48%, while PGR has yielded a comparatively higher 27.65% annualized return.
AFL
27.16%
-6.85%
15.59%
29.18%
16.93%
15.48%
PGR
51.62%
-6.63%
14.81%
54.33%
30.28%
27.65%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AFL vs. PGR - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and The Progressive Corporation (PGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AFL vs. PGR - Dividend Comparison
AFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, more than PGR's 0.48% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 1.95% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.46% | 2.13% |
PGR The Progressive Corporation | 0.48% | 0.25% | 0.31% | 6.23% | 2.68% | 3.89% | 1.86% | 1.21% | 2.50% | 2.16% | 5.53% | 1.05% |
Drawdowns
AFL vs. PGR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFL drawdown since its inception was -82.71%, which is greater than PGR's maximum drawdown of -71.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL and PGR. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AFL vs. PGR - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) is 6.48%, while The Progressive Corporation (PGR) has a volatility of 7.30%. This indicates that AFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AFL vs. PGR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aflac Incorporated and The Progressive Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities