PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
AFL vs. UNM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AFL and UNM is 0.47, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.00.5

Performance

AFL vs. UNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and Unum Group (UNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

0.00%5,000.00%10,000.00%15,000.00%20,000.00%25,000.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
23,770.29%
2,294.51%
AFL
UNM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AFL:

1.45

UNM:

3.30

Sortino Ratio

AFL:

1.83

UNM:

4.49

Omega Ratio

AFL:

1.30

UNM:

1.62

Calmar Ratio

AFL:

2.39

UNM:

5.26

Martin Ratio

AFL:

7.61

UNM:

18.41

Ulcer Index

AFL:

3.94%

UNM:

3.62%

Daily Std Dev

AFL:

20.63%

UNM:

20.24%

Max Drawdown

AFL:

-82.71%

UNM:

-89.38%

Current Drawdown

AFL:

-10.50%

UNM:

-6.57%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AFL:

$57.08B

UNM:

$13.31B

EPS

AFL:

$6.73

UNM:

$9.21

PE Ratio

AFL:

15.27

UNM:

7.91

PEG Ratio

AFL:

0.93

UNM:

2.50

Total Revenue (TTM)

AFL:

$17.30B

UNM:

$12.79B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AFL:

$17.30B

UNM:

$12.40B

EBITDA (TTM)

AFL:

$382.00M

UNM:

$2.44B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFL achieves a 27.16% return, which is significantly lower than UNM's 63.99% return. Over the past 10 years, AFL has outperformed UNM with an annualized return of 15.48%, while UNM has yielded a comparatively lower 10.96% annualized return.


AFL

YTD

27.16%

1M

-6.85%

6M

15.59%

1Y

29.18%

5Y*

16.93%

10Y*

15.48%

UNM

YTD

63.99%

1M

-4.53%

6M

43.69%

1Y

65.01%

5Y*

24.70%

10Y*

10.96%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFL vs. UNM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and Unum Group (UNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for AFL, currently valued at 1.45, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.001.453.30
The chart of Sortino ratio for AFL, currently valued at 1.82, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.001.834.49
The chart of Omega ratio for AFL, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.301.62
The chart of Calmar ratio for AFL, currently valued at 2.39, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.002.395.26
The chart of Martin ratio for AFL, currently valued at 7.61, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.0025.007.6118.41
AFL
UNM

The current AFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is lower than the UNM Sharpe Ratio of 3.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFL and UNM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.001.002.003.004.00JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
1.45
3.30
AFL
UNM

Dividends

AFL vs. UNM - Dividend Comparison

AFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than UNM's 2.18% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
1.95%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%2.46%2.13%
UNM
Unum Group
2.18%3.07%3.07%4.76%4.97%3.74%3.34%1.57%1.75%2.10%1.78%1.57%

Drawdowns

AFL vs. UNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFL drawdown since its inception was -82.71%, smaller than the maximum UNM drawdown of -89.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL and UNM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
-10.50%
-6.57%
AFL
UNM

Volatility

AFL vs. UNM - Volatility Comparison

Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and Unum Group (UNM) have volatilities of 6.48% and 6.42%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember
6.48%
6.42%
AFL
UNM

Financials

AFL vs. UNM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aflac Incorporated and Unum Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2024 PortfoliosLab