AFL vs. UNM

In the year-to-date period, AFL achieves a 38.35% return, which is significantly lower than UNM's 71.78% return. Over the past 10 years, AFL has outperformed UNM with an annualized return of 16.80%, while UNM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.89% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and Unum Group (UNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current AFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.95, which is lower than the UNM Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFL and UNM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

AFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.79%, less than UNM's 2.08% yield.

The maximum AFL drawdown since its inception was -82.71%, smaller than the maximum UNM drawdown of -89.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL and UNM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) is 7.16%, while Unum Group (UNM) has a volatility of 10.14%. This indicates that AFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aflac Incorporated and Unum Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.