PortfoliosLab logo
AFL vs. UNM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between AFL and UNM is 0.50, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

AFL vs. UNM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and Unum Group (UNM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

5,000.00%10,000.00%15,000.00%20,000.00%25,000.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
24,619.50%
2,544.21%
AFL
UNM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

AFL:

1.23

UNM:

2.00

Sortino Ratio

AFL:

1.65

UNM:

2.72

Omega Ratio

AFL:

1.25

UNM:

1.41

Calmar Ratio

AFL:

2.20

UNM:

3.60

Martin Ratio

AFL:

5.11

UNM:

12.43

Ulcer Index

AFL:

5.41%

UNM:

4.47%

Daily Std Dev

AFL:

22.46%

UNM:

27.85%

Max Drawdown

AFL:

-82.71%

UNM:

-89.38%

Current Drawdown

AFL:

-7.32%

UNM:

-5.11%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AFL:

$57.37B

UNM:

$14.00B

EPS

AFL:

$6.43

UNM:

$8.48

PE Ratio

AFL:

16.45

UNM:

9.39

PEG Ratio

AFL:

0.93

UNM:

2.50

PS Ratio

AFL:

3.40

UNM:

1.08

PB Ratio

AFL:

2.17

UNM:

1.25

Total Revenue (TTM)

AFL:

$13.69B

UNM:

$12.73B

Gross Profit (TTM)

AFL:

$13.69B

UNM:

$12.50B

EBITDA (TTM)

AFL:

$4.25B

UNM:

$2.21B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AFL achieves a 2.81% return, which is significantly lower than UNM's 8.89% return. Over the past 10 years, AFL has outperformed UNM with an annualized return of 15.42%, while UNM has yielded a comparatively lower 12.18% annualized return.


AFL

YTD

2.81%

1M

3.70%

6M

2.21%

1Y

29.73%

5Y*

28.50%

10Y*

15.42%

UNM

YTD

8.89%

1M

11.11%

6M

24.10%

1Y

56.31%

5Y*

46.41%

10Y*

12.18%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

AFL vs. UNM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AFL
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AFL is 8686
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AFL is 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AFL is 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AFL is 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AFL is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AFL is 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

UNM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UNM is 9595
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UNM is 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UNM is 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UNM is 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UNM is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UNM is 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

AFL vs. UNM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and Unum Group (UNM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current AFL Sharpe Ratio is 1.23, which is lower than the UNM Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AFL and UNM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.002.003.004.00December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
1.23
2.00
AFL
UNM

Dividends

AFL vs. UNM - Dividend Comparison

AFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.97%, less than UNM's 2.14% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
AFL
Aflac Incorporated
1.97%1.93%2.04%2.22%2.26%2.52%2.04%2.28%1.98%2.39%2.64%2.46%
UNM
Unum Group
2.14%2.15%3.07%3.07%4.76%4.97%3.74%3.34%1.57%1.75%2.10%1.78%

Drawdowns

AFL vs. UNM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AFL drawdown since its inception was -82.71%, smaller than the maximum UNM drawdown of -89.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL and UNM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
-7.32%
-5.11%
AFL
UNM

Volatility

AFL vs. UNM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) is 13.26%, while Unum Group (UNM) has a volatility of 16.59%. This indicates that AFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


5.00%10.00%15.00%December2025FebruaryMarchAprilMay
13.26%
16.59%
AFL
UNM

Financials

AFL vs. UNM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aflac Incorporated and Unum Group. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B20212022202320242025
5.50B
3.09B
(AFL) Total Revenue
(UNM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AFL vs. UNM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Aflac Incorporated and Unum Group over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

85.0%90.0%95.0%100.0%20212022202320242025
100.0%
100.0%
(AFL) Gross Margin
(UNM) Gross Margin
AFL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of 5.50B and revenue of 5.50B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

UNM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Unum Group reported a gross profit of 3.09B and revenue of 3.09B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.

AFL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 2.14B and revenue of 5.50B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.8%.

UNM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Unum Group reported an operating income of 213.30M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.9%.

AFL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 1.90B and revenue of 5.50B, resulting in a net margin of 34.6%.

UNM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Unum Group reported a net income of 189.10M and revenue of 3.09B, resulting in a net margin of 6.1%.