AFL vs. MET
Compare and contrast key facts about Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and MetLife, Inc. (MET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AFL or MET.
Correlation
The correlation between AFL and MET is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
AFL vs. MET - Performance Comparison
Loading data...
Key characteristics
AFL:
1.03
MET:
0.42
AFL:
1.43
MET:
0.77
AFL:
1.22
MET:
1.11
AFL:
1.85
MET:
0.60
AFL:
4.18
MET:
1.90
AFL:
5.55%
MET:
6.93%
AFL:
22.40%
MET:
29.42%
AFL:
-82.71%
MET:
-82.93%
AFL:
-8.94%
MET:
-8.15%
Fundamentals
AFL:
$56.17B
MET:
$54.48B
AFL:
$6.43
MET:
$6.12
AFL:
16.16
MET:
13.26
AFL:
0.93
MET:
1.11
AFL:
3.33
MET:
0.74
AFL:
2.16
MET:
1.98
AFL:
$17.09B
MET:
$72.92B
AFL:
$13.64B
MET:
$72.92B
AFL:
$4.39B
MET:
$6.39B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFL achieves a 1.01% return, which is significantly higher than MET's -1.00% return. Over the past 10 years, AFL has outperformed MET with an annualized return of 15.30%, while MET has yielded a comparatively lower 8.37% annualized return.
AFL
1.01%
-4.25%
-4.97%
22.90%
29.03%
15.30%
MET
-1.00%
10.40%
-1.17%
12.24%
24.42%
8.37%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AFL vs. MET — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AFL
MET
AFL vs. MET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and MetLife, Inc. (MET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Loading data...
Dividends
AFL vs. MET - Dividend Comparison
AFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, less than MET's 2.75% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 2.00% | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.46% |
MET MetLife, Inc. | 2.75% | 2.63% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 3.04% | 3.88% | 3.41% | 4.04% | 0.79% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
AFL vs. MET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFL drawdown since its inception was -82.71%, roughly equal to the maximum MET drawdown of -82.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL and MET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Loading data...
Volatility
AFL vs. MET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) is 7.05%, while MetLife, Inc. (MET) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that AFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading data...
Financials
AFL vs. MET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aflac Incorporated and MetLife, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
AFL vs. MET - Profitability Comparison
AFL - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported a gross profit of -50.00M and revenue of 3.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -1.5%.
MET - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported a gross profit of 18.28B and revenue of 18.28B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 100.0%.
AFL - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported an operating income of 145.00M and revenue of 3.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.3%.
MET - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported an operating income of 1.35B and revenue of 18.28B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.
AFL - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Aflac Incorporated reported a net income of 29.00M and revenue of 3.40B, resulting in a net margin of 0.9%.
MET - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, MetLife, Inc. reported a net income of 945.00M and revenue of 18.28B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.