AFL vs. AOS
Compare and contrast key facts about Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: AFL or AOS.
Correlation
The correlation between AFL and AOS is 0.29, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
AFL vs. AOS - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
AFL:
1.77
AOS:
-1.11
AFL:
2.35
AOS:
-1.47
AFL:
1.33
AOS:
0.81
AFL:
2.74
AOS:
-0.90
AFL:
6.75
AOS:
-1.60
AFL:
5.09%
AOS:
16.79%
AFL:
19.39%
AOS:
24.29%
AFL:
-82.71%
AOS:
-66.52%
AFL:
-2.06%
AOS:
-29.86%
Fundamentals
AFL:
$60.99B
AOS:
$9.14B
AFL:
$9.63
AOS:
$3.63
AFL:
11.60
AOS:
17.54
AFL:
0.93
AOS:
1.59
AFL:
$13.69B
AOS:
$2.84B
AFL:
$13.69B
AOS:
$1.07B
AFL:
$4.25B
AOS:
$573.20M
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, AFL achieves a 8.64% return, which is significantly higher than AOS's -6.20% return. Over the past 10 years, AFL has outperformed AOS with an annualized return of 16.08%, while AOS has yielded a comparatively lower 8.62% annualized return.
AFL
8.64%
3.86%
-0.57%
33.92%
31.37%
16.08%
AOS
-6.20%
-2.97%
-26.56%
-26.95%
14.34%
8.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
AFL vs. AOS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
AFL
AOS
AFL vs. AOS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) and A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
AFL vs. AOS - Dividend Comparison
AFL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than AOS's 2.07% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AFL Aflac Incorporated | 1.86% | 1.93% | 2.04% | 2.22% | 2.26% | 2.52% | 2.04% | 2.28% | 1.98% | 2.39% | 2.64% | 2.46% |
AOS A. O. Smith Corporation | 2.07% | 1.91% | 1.84% | 1.99% | 1.23% | 1.79% | 1.89% | 1.78% | 0.91% | 1.01% | 0.99% | 1.06% |
Drawdowns
AFL vs. AOS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum AFL drawdown since its inception was -82.71%, which is greater than AOS's maximum drawdown of -66.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AFL and AOS. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
AFL vs. AOS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Aflac Incorporated (AFL) is 4.37%, while A. O. Smith Corporation (AOS) has a volatility of 7.61%. This indicates that AFL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
AFL vs. AOS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Aflac Incorporated and A. O. Smith Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities