GEOS vs. CNR
GEOS (Geospace Technologies Corporation) and CNR (Core Natural Resources, Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — GEOS in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, CNR in Thermal Coal. Over the past 5 years, GEOS returned -3.14%/yr vs 38.12%/yr for CNR. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GEOS vs. CNR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEOS achieves a -58.66% return, which is significantly lower than CNR's -7.00% return.
GEOS
- 1D
- -3.19%
- 1M
- -13.70%
- YTD
- -58.66%
- 6M
- -55.34%
- 1Y
- -39.16%
- 3Y*
- -0.61%
- 5Y*
- -3.14%
- 10Y*
- -8.35%
CNR
- 1D
- -1.72%
- 1M
- -2.20%
- YTD
- -7.00%
- 6M
- -7.00%
- 1Y
- 18.52%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 38.12%
- 10Y*
- —
GEOS vs. CNR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEOS Geospace Technologies Corporation | -58.66% | 68.76% | -22.69% | 207.11% | -36.92% | -21.85% | -48.96% | 62.66% | -20.51% | -14.16% |
CNR Core Natural Resources, Inc | -7.00% | -16.58% | 6.59% | 60.65% | 195.52% | 214.98% | -50.31% | -54.24% | -19.74% | 75.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEOS and CNR is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.19 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2017 | 0.23 |
Fundamentals
GEOS:
$90.04M
CNR:
$4.19B
GEOS:
-$2.27
CNR:
-$1.22
GEOS:
0.89
CNR:
1.00
GEOS:
0.86
CNR:
1.15
GEOS:
$100.89M
CNR:
$4.23B
GEOS:
$14.39M
CNR:
$133.44M
GEOS:
-$23.75M
CNR:
$540.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEOS vs. CNR — Risk / Return Rank
GEOS
CNR
GEOS vs. CNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) and Core Natural Resources, Inc (CNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEOS | CNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.10 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.52 | 0.68 | -1.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.85 | 1.29 | -2.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEOS vs. CNR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEOS drawdown since its inception was -96.49%, roughly equal to the maximum CNR drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEOS and CNR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEOS | CNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.49% | -92.21% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.40% | -27.39% | -48.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.40% | -52.14% | -23.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -75.40% | -52.14% | -23.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.70% | -37.92% | -55.78% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.75% | -36.76% | -23.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.16% | 14.39% | +31.77% |
Volatility
GEOS vs. CNR - Volatility Comparison
Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to Core Natural Resources, Inc (CNR) at 14.87%. This indicates that GEOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEOS | CNR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.04% | 14.87% | +2.17% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 79.61% | 33.24% | +46.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 117.75% | 49.32% | +68.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.19% | 54.98% | +21.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.11% | 66.91% | +2.20% |
Dividends
GEOS vs. CNR - Dividend Comparison
GEOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNR Core Natural Resources, Inc | 0.49% | 0.45% | 0.47% | 2.19% | 3.15% |
GEOS Geospace Technologies Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GEOS vs. CNR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Geospace Technologies Corporation and Core Natural Resources, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GEOS vs. CNR - Profitability Comparison
GEOS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 694.00K and revenue of 19.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.
CNR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core Natural Resources, Inc reported a gross profit of 160.10M and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.
GEOS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of -11.42M and revenue of 19.74M, resulting in an operating margin of -57.8%.
CNR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core Natural Resources, Inc reported an operating income of 22.72M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.
GEOS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported a net income of -11.05M and revenue of 19.74M, resulting in a net margin of -56.0%.
CNR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Core Natural Resources, Inc reported a net income of 21.04M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GEOS and CNR have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GEOS has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to CNR (14.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEOS dropped -96.49% vs CNR's -92.21%.
CNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.38 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GEOS and CNR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer