PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEOS vs. CNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GEOS vs. CNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) and Core Natural Resources, Inc (CNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEOS achieves a -56.77% return, which is significantly lower than CNR's -9.59% return.


GEOS

1D
1.53%
1M
8.78%
6M
-52.72%
YTD
-56.77%
1Y
-53.91%
3Y*
-3.04%
5Y*
-3.49%
10Y*
-7.25%
ALL TIME*
-0.31%

CNR

1D
-1.59%
1M
0.63%
6M
-16.10%
YTD
-9.59%
1Y
10.17%
3Y*
3.48%
5Y*
32.77%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$45.98M$42.22M$57.17M
$581.65K$662.25K$1.32M

GEOS vs. CNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GEOS
Geospace Technologies Corporation
-56.77%68.76%-22.69%207.11%-36.92%-21.85%-48.96%62.66%-20.51%-14.16%
CNR
Core Natural Resources, Inc
-9.59%-16.58%6.59%60.65%195.52%214.98%-50.31%-54.24%-19.74%75.60%

Correlation

The correlation between GEOS and CNR is 0.26, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2017

0.23

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GEOS:

$94.56M

CNR:

$4.02B

EPS

GEOS:

-$2.27

CNR:

-$1.23

PS Ratio

GEOS:

0.93

CNR:

0.97

PB Ratio

GEOS:

0.90

CNR:

1.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

GEOS:

$100.89M

CNR:

$4.23B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GEOS:

$14.39M

CNR:

$133.44M

EBITDA (TTM)

GEOS:

-$23.75M

CNR:

$540.42M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEOS vs. CNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GEOS
GEOS Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
GEOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEOS Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GEOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

CNR
CNR Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
CNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNR Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
CNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNR Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GEOS vs. CNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) and Core Natural Resources, Inc (CNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GEOSCNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.98

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

1.07

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.71

0.28

-0.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.06

0.53

-1.59

GEOS vs. CNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEOS Sharpe Ratio is -0.57, which is lower than the CNR Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEOS and CNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEOS vs. CNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEOS drawdown since its inception was -96.49%, roughly equal to the maximum CNR drawdown of -92.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEOS and CNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEOSCNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.49%

-92.21%

-4.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-77.54%

-31.31%

-46.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-77.54%

-52.14%

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.54%

-52.14%

-25.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.41%

-39.66%

-53.75%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.87%

-36.78%

-24.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

51.72%

16.53%

+35.19%

Volatility

GEOS vs. CNR - Volatility Comparison

Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) has a higher volatility of 17.49% compared to Core Natural Resources, Inc (CNR) at 10.75%. This indicates that GEOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEOSCNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.49%

10.75%

+6.74%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

77.33%

33.24%

+44.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

97.04%

46.37%

+50.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.29%

54.03%

+22.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.09%

66.60%

+2.49%

Dividends

GEOS vs. CNR - Dividend Comparison

GEOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CNR
Core Natural Resources, Inc
0.50%0.45%0.47%2.19%3.15%
GEOS
Geospace Technologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GEOS vs. CNR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Geospace Technologies Corporation and Core Natural Resources, Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

GEOS vs. CNR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Geospace Technologies Corporation and Core Natural Resources, Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

GEOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 694.00K and revenue of 19.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.

CNR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Core Natural Resources, Inc reported a gross profit of 160.10M and revenue of 1.08B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 14.8%.

GEOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of -11.42M and revenue of 19.74M, resulting in an operating margin of -57.8%.

CNR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Core Natural Resources, Inc reported an operating income of 22.72M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.1%.

GEOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported a net income of -11.05M and revenue of 19.74M, resulting in a net margin of -56.0%.

CNR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Core Natural Resources, Inc reported a net income of 21.04M and revenue of 1.08B, resulting in a net margin of 1.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GEOS and CNR have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEOS has higher volatility (17.49%) compared to CNR (10.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEOS dropped -96.49% vs CNR's -92.21%.

CNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.19 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEOS and CNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer