GEOS vs. CNX
GEOS (Geospace Technologies Corporation) and CNX (CNX Resources Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — GEOS in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, CNX in Oil & Gas E&P. Over the past 10 years, GEOS returned -8.29%/yr vs 9.45%/yr for CNX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GEOS vs. CNX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GEOS achieves a -61.15% return, which is significantly lower than CNX's -8.59% return. Over the past 10 years, GEOS has underperformed CNX with an annualized return of -8.29%, while CNX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.45% annualized return.
GEOS
- 1D
- -1.94%
- 1M
- -23.69%
- YTD
- -61.15%
- 6M
- -61.87%
- 1Y
- -58.15%
- 3Y*
- -1.14%
- 5Y*
- -3.98%
- 10Y*
- -8.29%
CNX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -3.22%
- YTD
- -8.59%
- 6M
- -9.14%
- 1Y
- 0.90%
- 3Y*
- 25.48%
- 5Y*
- 18.02%
- 10Y*
- 9.45%
GEOS vs. CNX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEOS Geospace Technologies Corporation | -61.15% | 68.76% | -22.69% | 207.11% | -36.92% | -21.85% | -48.96% | 62.66% | -20.51% | -36.30% |
CNX CNX Resources Corporation | -8.59% | 0.27% | 83.35% | 18.76% | 22.47% | 27.31% | 22.03% | -22.50% | -21.94% | -19.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEOS and CNX is 0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 30, 1999 | 0.25 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GEOS and CNX has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Fundamentals
GEOS:
-$2.27
CNX:
$9.47
GEOS:
0.84
CNX:
1.72
GEOS:
$100.89M
CNX:
$2.43B
GEOS:
$14.39M
CNX:
$1.17B
GEOS:
-$23.75M
CNX:
$2.24B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEOS vs. CNX — Risk / Return Rank
GEOS
CNX
GEOS vs. CNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) and CNX Resources Corporation (CNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEOS | CNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.94 | 1.03 | -0.09 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.76 | 0.04 | -0.80 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.25 | 0.08 | -1.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEOS vs. CNX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEOS drawdown since its inception was -96.49%, roughly equal to the maximum CNX drawdown of -95.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEOS and CNX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEOS | CNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.49% | -95.41% | -1.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.87% | -24.64% | -52.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -76.87% | -33.37% | -43.50% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -76.87% | -38.23% | -38.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.72% | -77.19% | -6.53% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.07% | -69.03% | -25.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.76% | -58.43% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 46.39% | 11.47% | +34.92% |
Volatility
GEOS vs. CNX - Volatility Comparison
Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) has a higher volatility of 15.57% compared to CNX Resources Corporation (CNX) at 6.92%. This indicates that GEOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEOS | CNX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.57% | 6.92% | +8.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 79.44% | 21.12% | +58.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 100.59% | 30.05% | +70.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.20% | 35.26% | +40.94% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.08% | 48.31% | +20.77% |
Dividends
GEOS vs. CNX - Dividend Comparison
Neither GEOS nor CNX has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CNX CNX Resources Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 1.84% |
GEOS Geospace Technologies Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GEOS vs. CNX - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Geospace Technologies Corporation and CNX Resources Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GEOS vs. CNX - Profitability Comparison
GEOS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 694.00K and revenue of 19.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.
CNX - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNX Resources Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 786.65M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
GEOS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of -11.42M and revenue of 19.74M, resulting in an operating margin of -57.8%.
CNX - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNX Resources Corporation reported an operating income of 2.03M and revenue of 786.65M, resulting in an operating margin of 0.3%.
GEOS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported a net income of -11.05M and revenue of 19.74M, resulting in a net margin of -56.0%.
CNX - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, CNX Resources Corporation reported a net income of 348.15M and revenue of 786.65M, resulting in a net margin of 44.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GEOS and CNX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GEOS has higher volatility (15.57%) compared to CNX (6.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEOS dropped -96.49% vs CNX's -95.41%.
CNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.03 vs -0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GEOS and CNX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer