GEOS vs. BORR
GEOS (Geospace Technologies Corporation) and BORR (Borr Drilling Ltd) are both stocks. Both are in the Energy sector — GEOS in Oil & Gas Equipment & Services, BORR in Oil & Gas Drilling. Over the past 5 years, GEOS returned -3.49%/yr vs 23.52%/yr for BORR. Their 0.25 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
GEOS vs. BORR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GEOS
- 1D
- 1.53%
- 1M
- 8.78%
- 6M
- -52.72%
- YTD
- -56.77%
- 1Y
- -53.91%
- 3Y*
- -3.04%
- 5Y*
- -3.49%
- 10Y*
- -7.25%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.31%
BORR
- 1D
- 1.00%
- 1M
- -10.24%
- 6M
- -13.89%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 114.36%
- 3Y*
- -21.81%
- 5Y*
- 23.52%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -26.59%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $14.98M | $16.54M | $33.68M | |
| $581.65K | $662.25K | $1.32M |
GEOS vs. BORR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GEOS Geospace Technologies Corporation | -56.77% | 68.76% | -22.69% | 207.11% | -36.92% | -21.85% | -48.96% | 62.66% | -15.49% |
BORR Borr Drilling Ltd | 0.00% | 4.15% | -44.49% | 48.09% | 141.26% | 26.50% | -91.00% | -26.12% | -54.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between GEOS and BORR is 0.28, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 22, 2018 | 0.25 |
Fundamentals
GEOS:
$94.56M
BORR:
$1.24B
GEOS:
-$2.27
BORR:
$0.12
GEOS:
0.93
BORR:
1.16
GEOS:
0.90
BORR:
1.04
GEOS:
$100.89M
BORR:
$1.05B
GEOS:
$14.39M
BORR:
$483.30M
GEOS:
-$23.75M
BORR:
$417.40M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GEOS vs. BORR — Risk / Return Rank
GEOS
BORR
GEOS vs. BORR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) and Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GEOS | BORR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.95 | 1.28 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.71 | 2.37 | -3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.06 | 6.21 | -7.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GEOS vs. BORR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GEOS drawdown since its inception was -96.49%, roughly equal to the maximum BORR drawdown of -99.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEOS and BORR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GEOS | BORR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.49% | -99.07% | +2.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -77.54% | -41.75% | -35.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -77.54% | -80.44% | +2.90% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -77.54% | -80.90% | +3.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -83.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -93.41% | -92.05% | -1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -60.87% | -88.83% | +27.96% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 51.72% | 15.93% | +35.79% |
Volatility
GEOS vs. BORR - Volatility Comparison
Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) has a higher volatility of 17.49% compared to Borr Drilling Ltd (BORR) at 11.89%. This indicates that GEOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BORR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GEOS | BORR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.49% | 11.89% | +5.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 77.33% | 37.67% | +39.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 97.04% | 58.80% | +38.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 76.29% | 72.02% | +4.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 69.09% | 117.73% | -48.64% |
Dividends
GEOS vs. BORR - Dividend Comparison
Neither GEOS nor BORR has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BORR Borr Drilling Ltd | 0.00% | 0.50% | 7.69% |
GEOS Geospace Technologies Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
GEOS vs. BORR - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Geospace Technologies Corporation and Borr Drilling Ltd. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
GEOS vs. BORR - Profitability Comparison
GEOS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 694.00K and revenue of 19.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.
BORR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Borr Drilling Ltd reported a gross profit of 59.80M and revenue of 247.00M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 24.2%.
GEOS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of -11.42M and revenue of 19.74M, resulting in an operating margin of -57.8%.
BORR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Borr Drilling Ltd reported an operating income of 46.00M and revenue of 247.00M, resulting in an operating margin of 18.6%.
GEOS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported a net income of -11.05M and revenue of 19.74M, resulting in a net margin of -56.0%.
BORR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Borr Drilling Ltd reported a net income of -29.00M and revenue of 247.00M, resulting in a net margin of -11.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
GEOS and BORR have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GEOS has higher volatility (17.49%) compared to BORR (11.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEOS dropped -96.49% vs BORR's -99.07%.
BORR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs -0.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GEOS and BORR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer