PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CNR vs. UNP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CNR vs. UNP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Core Natural Resources, Inc (CNR) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CNR achieves a -9.12% return, which is significantly lower than UNP's 27.21% return.


CNR

1D
0.51%
1M
1.15%
6M
-10.64%
YTD
-9.12%
1Y
10.73%
3Y*
4.28%
5Y*
33.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.80%

UNP

1D
-0.31%
1M
3.18%
6M
25.10%
YTD
27.21%
1Y
35.75%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
8.42%
10Y*
14.49%
ALL TIME*
12.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$45.45M$41.66M$56.17M
$1.12B$930.44M$832.47M

CNR vs. UNP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CNR
Core Natural Resources, Inc
-9.12%-16.58%6.59%60.65%195.52%214.98%-50.31%-54.24%-19.74%75.60%
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
27.21%3.86%-5.10%21.61%-15.93%23.31%17.64%33.70%5.26%15.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CNR and UNP is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.17

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 14, 2017

0.24

Over the past year, the correlation between CNR and UNP has dropped to 0.02 - well below their long-term average of 0.24, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CNR:

$4.05B

UNP:

$173.01B

EPS

CNR:

-$1.23

UNP:

$8.99

PS Ratio

CNR:

0.97

UNP:

9.32

PB Ratio

CNR:

1.12

UNP:

8.37K

Total Revenue (TTM)

CNR:

$4.23B

UNP:

$18.55B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CNR:

$133.44M

UNP:

$8.44B

EBITDA (TTM)

CNR:

$540.42M

UNP:

$9.81B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CNR vs. UNP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CNR
CNR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
CNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
CNR Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
CNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
CNR Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

UNP
UNP Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
UNP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNP Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
UNP Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNP Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CNR vs. UNP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Core Natural Resources, Inc (CNR) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CNRUNPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.39

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.30

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

2.92

-2.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.65

7.85

-7.20

CNR vs. UNP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CNR Sharpe Ratio is 0.23, which is lower than the UNP Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CNR and UNP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CNR vs. UNP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CNR drawdown since its inception was -92.21%, which is greater than UNP's maximum drawdown of -67.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CNR and UNP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CNRUNPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-92.21%

-67.49%

-24.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.31%

-12.28%

-19.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-52.14%

-17.75%

-34.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.14%

-31.83%

-20.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-39.35%

-5.24%

-34.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.78%

-17.03%

-19.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.63%

4.57%

+12.06%

Volatility

CNR vs. UNP - Volatility Comparison

Core Natural Resources, Inc (CNR) has a higher volatility of 10.56% compared to Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) at 7.34%. This indicates that CNR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CNRUNPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.56%

7.34%

+3.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.24%

17.76%

+15.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

46.44%

22.20%

+24.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.05%

22.99%

+31.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

66.58%

25.35%

+41.23%

Dividends

CNR vs. UNP - Dividend Comparison

CNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.50%, less than UNP's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CNR
Core Natural Resources, Inc
0.50%0.45%0.47%2.19%3.15%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
1.90%2.35%2.32%2.12%2.45%1.70%1.86%2.05%2.21%1.85%2.17%2.81%

Financials

CNR vs. UNP - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Core Natural Resources, Inc and Union Pacific Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CNR and UNP have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CNR has higher volatility (10.56%) compared to UNP (7.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CNR dropped -92.21% vs UNP's -67.49%.

UNP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CNR and UNP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer