PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GEOS vs. CEPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

GEOS vs. CEPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) and Central Puerto S.A. (CEPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEOS achieves a -58.66% return, which is significantly lower than CEPU's -11.14% return.


GEOS

1D
-3.19%
1M
-13.70%
YTD
-58.66%
6M
-55.34%
1Y
-39.16%
3Y*
-0.61%
5Y*
-3.14%
10Y*
-8.35%

CEPU

1D
-0.77%
1M
11.79%
YTD
-11.14%
6M
-11.04%
1Y
32.91%
3Y*
36.44%
5Y*
48.25%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GEOS vs. CEPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
GEOS
Geospace Technologies Corporation
-58.66%68.76%-22.69%207.11%-36.92%-21.85%-48.96%62.66%-26.62%
CEPU
Central Puerto S.A.
-11.14%20.77%60.75%71.30%95.14%15.93%-44.44%-45.56%-42.82%

Correlation

The correlation between GEOS and CEPU is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 2, 2018

0.16

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GEOS:

$90.04M

CEPU:

$2.34B

EPS

GEOS:

-$2.27

CEPU:

ARS 4.58K

PS Ratio

GEOS:

0.89

CEPU:

1.70

PB Ratio

GEOS:

0.86

CEPU:

1.28

Total Revenue (TTM)

GEOS:

$100.89M

CEPU:

ARS 2.01T

Gross Profit (TTM)

GEOS:

$14.39M

CEPU:

ARS 701.24B

EBITDA (TTM)

GEOS:

-$23.75M

CEPU:

ARS 855.91B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GEOS vs. CEPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEOS
GEOS Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
GEOS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GEOS Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GEOS Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
GEOS Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
GEOS Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

CEPU
CEPU Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
CEPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CEPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
CEPU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CEPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
CEPU Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GEOS vs. CEPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) and Central Puerto S.A. (CEPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GEOSCEPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.16

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.52

0.81

-1.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.85

1.95

-2.80

GEOS vs. CEPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GEOS Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the CEPU Sharpe Ratio of 0.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEOS and CEPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GEOS vs. CEPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEOS drawdown since its inception was -96.49%, which is greater than CEPU's maximum drawdown of -88.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEOS and CEPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GEOSCEPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.49%

-88.97%

-7.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-75.40%

-40.74%

-34.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-75.40%

-51.70%

-23.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-75.40%

-51.70%

-23.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-83.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-93.70%

-13.37%

-80.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-60.75%

-54.88%

-5.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

46.16%

16.88%

+29.28%

Volatility

GEOS vs. CEPU - Volatility Comparison

Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) has a higher volatility of 17.04% compared to Central Puerto S.A. (CEPU) at 13.00%. This indicates that GEOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CEPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GEOSCEPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.04%

13.00%

+4.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

79.61%

31.78%

+47.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

117.75%

67.21%

+50.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

76.19%

56.98%

+19.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

69.11%

61.28%

+7.83%

Dividends

GEOS vs. CEPU - Dividend Comparison

Neither GEOS nor CEPU has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
CEPU
Central Puerto S.A.
0.00%0.00%0.64%8.91%2.78%0.00%0.00%2.44%3.70%
GEOS
Geospace Technologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

GEOS vs. CEPU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Geospace Technologies Corporation and Central Puerto S.A.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00200.00B400.00B600.00B800.00B1.00T1.20T20222023202420252026
19.74M
1.16T
(GEOS) Total Revenue
(CEPU) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. GEOS values in USD, CEPU values in ARS

GEOS vs. CEPU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Geospace Technologies Corporation and Central Puerto S.A. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
3.5%
35.7%
Portfolio components
GEOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 694.00K and revenue of 19.74M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 3.5%.

CEPU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Puerto S.A. reported a gross profit of 415.00B and revenue of 1.16T. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.7%.

GEOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of -11.42M and revenue of 19.74M, resulting in an operating margin of -57.8%.

CEPU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Puerto S.A. reported an operating income of 310.62B and revenue of 1.16T, resulting in an operating margin of 26.7%.

GEOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported a net income of -11.05M and revenue of 19.74M, resulting in a net margin of -56.0%.

CEPU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Central Puerto S.A. reported a net income of 440.08B and revenue of 1.16T, resulting in a net margin of 37.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


GEOS and CEPU have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GEOS has higher volatility (17.04%) compared to CEPU (13.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GEOS dropped -96.49% vs CEPU's -88.97%.

CEPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.49 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GEOS and CEPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer