PortfoliosLab logo
GEOS vs. LDOS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between GEOS and LDOS is 0.52, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

GEOS vs. LDOS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GEOS:

-0.81

LDOS:

0.11

Sortino Ratio

GEOS:

-1.17

LDOS:

0.28

Omega Ratio

GEOS:

0.86

LDOS:

1.04

Calmar Ratio

GEOS:

-0.46

LDOS:

0.05

Martin Ratio

GEOS:

-1.44

LDOS:

0.08

Ulcer Index

GEOS:

30.31%

LDOS:

20.32%

Daily Std Dev

GEOS:

51.55%

LDOS:

30.20%

Max Drawdown

GEOS:

-96.49%

LDOS:

-51.28%

Current Drawdown

GEOS:

-94.75%

LDOS:

-25.84%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

GEOS:

$72.87M

LDOS:

$19.23B

EPS

GEOS:

-$1.23

LDOS:

$9.79

PEG Ratio

GEOS:

-0.61

LDOS:

2.34

PS Ratio

GEOS:

0.63

LDOS:

1.14

PB Ratio

GEOS:

0.54

LDOS:

4.46

Total Revenue (TTM)

GEOS:

$116.54M

LDOS:

$16.93B

Gross Profit (TTM)

GEOS:

$46.35M

LDOS:

$2.92B

EBITDA (TTM)

GEOS:

-$6.95M

LDOS:

$2.23B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GEOS achieves a -41.92% return, which is significantly lower than LDOS's 3.41% return. Over the past 10 years, GEOS has underperformed LDOS with an annualized return of -12.32%, while LDOS has yielded a comparatively higher 18.93% annualized return.


GEOS

YTD

-41.92%

1M

-9.63%

6M

-45.81%

1Y

-41.39%

3Y*

-1.66%

5Y*

-5.88%

10Y*

-12.32%

LDOS

YTD

3.41%

1M

0.91%

6M

-9.70%

1Y

3.33%

3Y*

13.94%

5Y*

8.60%

10Y*

18.93%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Geospace Technologies Corporation

Leidos Holdings, Inc.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GEOS vs. LDOS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GEOS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GEOS is 1111
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GEOS is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GEOS is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GEOS is 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GEOS is 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GEOS is 77
Martin Ratio Rank

LDOS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of LDOS is 5050
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of LDOS is 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of LDOS is 4444
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of LDOS is 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of LDOS is 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of LDOS is 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GEOS vs. LDOS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) and Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current GEOS Sharpe Ratio is -0.81, which is lower than the LDOS Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GEOS and LDOS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

GEOS vs. LDOS - Dividend Comparison

GEOS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LDOS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.05%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
GEOS
Geospace Technologies Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LDOS
Leidos Holdings, Inc.
1.05%1.07%1.35%1.37%1.57%1.29%1.35%2.43%1.98%29.17%3.41%2.94%

Drawdowns

GEOS vs. LDOS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GEOS drawdown since its inception was -96.49%, which is greater than LDOS's maximum drawdown of -51.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GEOS and LDOS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

GEOS vs. LDOS - Volatility Comparison

Geospace Technologies Corporation (GEOS) has a higher volatility of 14.90% compared to Leidos Holdings, Inc. (LDOS) at 7.62%. This indicates that GEOS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LDOS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

GEOS vs. LDOS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Geospace Technologies Corporation and Leidos Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
18.02M
4.25B
(GEOS) Total Revenue
(LDOS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

GEOS vs. LDOS - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Geospace Technologies Corporation and Leidos Holdings, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%20212022202320242025
9.7%
17.8%
(GEOS) Gross Margin
(LDOS) Gross Margin
GEOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.75M and revenue of 18.02M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 9.7%.

LDOS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 757.00M and revenue of 4.25B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.

GEOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported an operating income of -10.28M and revenue of 18.02M, resulting in an operating margin of -57.0%.

LDOS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of 530.00M and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in an operating margin of 12.5%.

GEOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Geospace Technologies Corporation reported a net income of -9.80M and revenue of 18.02M, resulting in a net margin of -54.4%.

LDOS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Leidos Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of 363.00M and revenue of 4.25B, resulting in a net margin of 8.6%.