GENW vs. EFAS
GENW (Genter Capital International Dividend ETF) and EFAS (Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GENW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Genter Capital, while EFAS is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI EAFE Top 50 Dividend Index. GENW is actively managed, while EFAS is passively managed. Over the past year, GENW returned 34.63% vs 32.01% for EFAS. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. GENW charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for EFAS.
Performance
GENW vs. EFAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENW achieves a 17.31% return, which is significantly lower than EFAS's 20.56% return.
GENW
- 1D
- -0.35%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- 6M
- 9.84%
- YTD
- 17.31%
- 1Y
- 34.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 36.56%
EFAS
- 1D
- -0.90%
- 1M
- 6.31%
- 6M
- 14.73%
- YTD
- 20.56%
- 1Y
- 32.01%
- 3Y*
- 25.41%
- 5Y*
- 14.43%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 10.80%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $411.25K | $354.75K | $345.09K | |
| $15.28K | $15.38K | $15.74K |
GENW vs. EFAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GENW Genter Capital International Dividend ETF | 17.31% | 37.92% |
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 20.56% | 48.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENW and EFAS is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2025 | 0.70 |
The correlation between GENW and EFAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENW vs. EFAS — Risk / Return Rank
GENW
EFAS
GENW vs. EFAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital International Dividend ETF (GENW) and Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GENW | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.66 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.52 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.35 | 6.07 | -2.72 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.58 | 14.92 | -2.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GENW vs. EFAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENW drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, smaller than the maximum EFAS drawdown of -44.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENW and EFAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENW | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -44.38% | +30.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -5.30% | -5.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -11.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -28.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.35% | -0.90% | +0.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.60% | -6.99% | +5.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.75% | 2.15% | +0.60% |
Volatility
GENW vs. EFAS - Volatility Comparison
Genter Capital International Dividend ETF (GENW) has a higher volatility of 4.08% compared to Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF (EFAS) at 2.71%. This indicates that GENW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EFAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENW | EFAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.08% | 2.71% | +1.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.81% | 8.68% | +3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.90% | 10.95% | +2.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 15.51% | +0.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 18.23% | -2.28% |
GENW vs. EFAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENW has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than EFAS's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENW vs. EFAS - Dividend Comparison
GENW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.20%, less than EFAS's 4.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EFAS Global X MSCI SuperDividend® EAFE ETF | 4.52% | 4.83% | 6.76% | 6.33% | 7.28% | 5.19% | 4.34% | 5.75% | 6.63% | 6.15% | 0.21% |
GENW Genter Capital International Dividend ETF | 2.20% | 2.89% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENW and EFAS have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GENW has higher volatility (4.08%) compared to EFAS (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENW dropped -14.36% vs EFAS's -44.38%.
On 1-year performance, GENW leads with 34.63% vs 32.01% for EFAS. On fees, GENW is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, EFAS has been the lower-risk option at 2.71%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GENW has performed better with a 34.63% return vs 32.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GENW is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for EFAS.
EFAS has the higher dividend yield at 4.52%, compared with 2.20% for GENW.
GENW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while EFAS is Dividend. They also come from different issuers: Genter Capital and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GENW and 0.55% for EFAS.
EFAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENW and EFAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer