PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GENW vs. GENM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GENW vs. GENM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Genter Capital International Dividend ETF (GENW) and Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GENW achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than GENM's 1.68% return.


GENW

1D
-1.07%
1M
3.58%
YTD
11.53%
6M
14.64%
1Y
28.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GENM

1D
0.10%
1M
0.64%
YTD
1.68%
6M
1.86%
1Y
5.22%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GENW vs. GENM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GENW and GENM is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GENW vs. GENM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GENW
GENW Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
GENW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GENW Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
GENW Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
GENW Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
GENW Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

GENM
GENM Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
GENM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GENM Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GENM Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
GENM Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
GENM Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GENW vs. GENM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital International Dividend ETF (GENW) and Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GENWGENMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.10

1.82

+0.28

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.92

2.74

+0.18

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

2.43

+0.38

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

10.40

7.90

+2.49

GENW vs. GENM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GENW Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the GENM Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GENW and GENM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GENWGENMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.82

+0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.26

1.43

+0.83

Drawdowns

GENW vs. GENM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GENW drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, which is greater than GENM's maximum drawdown of -2.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENW and GENM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GENWGENMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.36%

-2.41%

-11.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-2.15%

-8.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.33%

-0.38%

-0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.69%

-0.49%

-1.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.79%

0.66%

+2.13%

Volatility

GENW vs. GENM - Volatility Comparison

Genter Capital International Dividend ETF (GENW) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) at 0.61%. This indicates that GENW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GENM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GENWGENMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.96%

0.61%

+4.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.40%

1.86%

+9.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.79%

2.88%

+10.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

3.16%

+13.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.24%

3.16%

+13.08%

GENW vs. GENM - Expense Ratio Comparison

GENW has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GENM's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

GENW vs. GENM - Dividend Comparison

GENW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than GENM's 2.92% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GENW and GENM have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GENW has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to GENM (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENW dropped -14.36% vs GENM's -2.41%.

On 1-year performance, GENW leads with 28.89% vs 5.22% for GENM. On fees, GENW is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, GENM has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GENW has performed better with a 28.89% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GENW is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GENM.

GENM has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 2.60% for GENW.

GENW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GENM is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GENW and 0.39% for GENM.

GENW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GENW and GENM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer