GENW vs. GENM
GENW (Genter Capital International Dividend ETF) and GENM (Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GENW is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Genter Capital, while GENM is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by Genter Capital. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, GENW returned 28.89% vs 5.22% for GENM. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GENW charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for GENM.
Performance
GENW vs. GENM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GENW achieves a 11.53% return, which is significantly higher than GENM's 1.68% return.
GENW
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 3.58%
- YTD
- 11.53%
- 6M
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 28.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GENM
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 0.64%
- YTD
- 1.68%
- 6M
- 1.86%
- 1Y
- 5.22%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GENW vs. GENM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GENW Genter Capital International Dividend ETF | 11.53% | 37.92% |
GENM Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF | 1.68% | 5.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between GENW and GENM is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GENW vs. GENM — Risk / Return Rank
GENW
GENM
GENW vs. GENM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Genter Capital International Dividend ETF (GENW) and Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GENW | GENM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.10 | 1.82 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.92 | 2.74 | +0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.37 | 0.00 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.81 | 2.43 | +0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.40 | 7.90 | +2.49 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GENW | GENM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.82 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.26 | 1.43 | +0.83 |
Drawdowns
GENW vs. GENM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GENW drawdown since its inception was -14.36%, which is greater than GENM's maximum drawdown of -2.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GENW and GENM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GENW | GENM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.36% | -2.41% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.32% | -2.15% | -8.17% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.33% | -0.38% | -0.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.69% | -0.49% | -1.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.79% | 0.66% | +2.13% |
Volatility
GENW vs. GENM - Volatility Comparison
Genter Capital International Dividend ETF (GENW) has a higher volatility of 4.96% compared to Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF (GENM) at 0.61%. This indicates that GENW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GENM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GENW | GENM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.96% | 0.61% | +4.35% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.40% | 1.86% | +9.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.79% | 2.88% | +10.91% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 3.16% | +13.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.24% | 3.16% | +13.08% |
GENW vs. GENM - Expense Ratio Comparison
GENW has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than GENM's 0.39% expense ratio.
Dividends
GENW vs. GENM - Dividend Comparison
GENW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.60%, less than GENM's 2.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GENM Genter Capital Municipal Quality Intermediate ETF | 2.92% | 2.88% | 2.19% |
GENW Genter Capital International Dividend ETF | 2.60% | 2.89% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GENW and GENM have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GENW has higher volatility (4.96%) compared to GENM (0.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GENW dropped -14.36% vs GENM's -2.41%.
On 1-year performance, GENW leads with 28.89% vs 5.22% for GENM. On fees, GENW is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, GENM has been the lower-risk option at 0.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, GENW has performed better with a 28.89% return vs 5.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GENW is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for GENM.
GENM has the higher dividend yield at 2.92%, compared with 2.60% for GENW.
GENW is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while GENM is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for GENW and 0.39% for GENM.
GENW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GENW and GENM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer