GDXY vs. GLL

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

GDXY (YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF) and GLL (ProShares UltraShort Gold) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXY is a Gold fund actively managed by YieldMax, while GLL is a Leveraged Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Gold (-200%). GDXY is actively managed, while GLL is passively managed. Over the past year, GDXY returned 10.94% vs -37.00% for GLL. At a correlation of -0.79, they often move in opposite directions. GDXY charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for GLL.

Performance

GDXY vs. GLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXY achieves a -20.92% return, which is significantly lower than GLL's 5.05% return.

GDXY

• 1D: -3.28%
• 1M: -15.24%
• 6M: -27.34%
• YTD: -20.92%
• 1Y: 10.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GLL

• 1D: 3.90%
• 1M: 18.00%
• 6M: 19.80%
• YTD: 5.05%
• 1Y: -37.00%
• 3Y*: -37.43%
• 5Y*: -27.00%
• 10Y*: -20.63%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXY vs. GLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF	-20.92%	88.08%	-11.84%
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold	5.05%	-62.81%	-11.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXY and GLL is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024	-0.79

The correlation between GDXY and GLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.80 to -0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

GDXY vs. GLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXY

GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 14
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 14
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 16
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 13

GLL

GLL Risk / Return Rank: 4
GLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
GLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
GLL Omega Ratio Rank: 4
GLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
GLL Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXY vs. GLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDXY	GLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.28	-0.67	+0.95
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.60	-0.87	+1.47
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.08	0.90	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.30	-0.57	+0.87
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.71	-0.83	+1.55

GDXY vs. GLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXY Sharpe Ratio is 0.28, which is higher than the GLL Sharpe Ratio of -0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXY and GLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDXY vs. GLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXY drawdown since its inception was -36.52%, smaller than the maximum GLL drawdown of -99.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXY and GLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXY	GLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.52%	-99.24%	+62.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-36.52%	-65.10%	+28.58%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-87.95%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-89.76%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-95.76%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-36.52%	-98.70%	+62.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.77%	-85.20%	+77.43%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	15.39%	44.38%	-28.99%

Volatility

GDXY vs. GLL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) is 9.79%, while ProShares UltraShort Gold (GLL) has a volatility of 12.83%. This indicates that GDXY experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDXY	GLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.79%	12.83%	-3.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.26%	46.49%	-13.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	39.10%	55.17%	-16.07%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.59%	36.73%	-4.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.59%	32.44%	+0.15%

GDXY vs. GLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXY has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than GLL's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXY vs. GLL - Dividend Comparison

GDXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 90.05%, while GLL has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF	90.05%	52.13%	23.91%
GLL ProShares UltraShort Gold	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXY and GLL in my portfolio?

GDXY and GLL have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDXY or GLL?

GLL has higher volatility (12.83%) compared to GDXY (9.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXY dropped -36.52% vs GLL's -99.24%.

Which ETF is better, GDXY or GLL?

On 1-year performance, GDXY leads with 10.94% vs -37.00% for GLL. On fees, GLL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, GDXY has been the lower-risk option at 9.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDXY or GLL?

Over the 1-year period, GDXY has performed better with a 10.94% return vs -37.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXY or GLL?

GLL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for GDXY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXY or GLL?

GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 90.05%, compared with 0.00% for GLL.

What is the main difference between GDXY and GLL?

GDXY is categorized as Gold, while GLL is Leveraged Commodities. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for GDXY and 0.95% for GLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDXY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.28 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.