GDXY vs. GDXW

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

GDXY (YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF) and GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) are both Gold funds. Both are actively managed. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GDXY charges 1.08%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for GDXW.

Performance

GDXY vs. GDXW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXY achieves a -17.00% return, which is significantly higher than GDXW's -18.13% return.

GDXY

• 1D: 0.30%
• 1M: -5.34%
• 6M: -20.79%
• YTD: -17.00%
• 1Y: 15.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GDXW

• 1D: -0.28%
• 1M: -6.96%
• 6M: -24.98%
• YTD: -18.13%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXY vs. GDXW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF	-17.00%	14.29%
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	-18.13%	25.26%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXY and GDXW is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025	0.98

Return for Risk

GDXY vs. GDXW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXY

GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 17
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 19
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 16

GDXW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXY vs. GDXW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) and Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDXY	GDXW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.44	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.77	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.48	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.14	—	—

Drawdowns

GDXY vs. GDXW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXY drawdown since its inception was -34.98%, smaller than the maximum GDXW drawdown of -44.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXY and GDXW.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXY	GDXW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.98%	-44.14%	+9.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-34.98%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.37%	-42.33%	+8.96%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.57%	-17.13%	+9.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.75%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDXY	GDXW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	12.51%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	33.17%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	38.87%	62.22%	-23.35%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.57%	62.22%	-29.65%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	32.57%	62.22%	-29.65%

GDXY vs. GDXW - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXY has a 1.08% expense ratio, which is higher than GDXW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXY vs. GDXW - Dividend Comparison

GDXY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 84.15%, more than GDXW's 53.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	53.76%	7.48%	0.00%
GDXY YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF	84.15%	52.13%	23.91%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXY and GDXW in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.98, GDXY and GDXW move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GDXY or GDXW?

On fees, GDXW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXY or GDXW?

GDXW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for GDXY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXY or GDXW?

GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 84.15%, compared with 53.76% for GDXW.

What is the main difference between GDXY and GDXW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.08% for GDXY and 0.99% for GDXW.