GDXW vs. RING

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

GDXW (Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF) and RING (iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF) are both Gold funds. GDXW is actively managed, while RING is passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. GDXW charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.39%/yr for RING.

Performance

GDXW vs. RING - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -4.89% return, which is significantly lower than RING's 0.30% return.

GDXW

• 1D: -4.02%
• 1M: -1.27%
• YTD: -4.89%
• 6M: 2.36%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

RING

• 1D: -3.07%
• 1M: -0.66%
• YTD: 0.30%
• 6M: 7.49%
• 1Y: 67.87%
• 3Y*: 47.07%
• 5Y*: 19.93%
• 10Y*: 14.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXW vs. RING - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	-4.89%	21.25%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.30%	19.03%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and RING is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 31, 2025	0.99

Return for Risk

GDXW vs. RING — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

RING

RING Risk / Return Rank: 39
RING Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
RING Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
RING Omega Ratio Rank: 39
RING Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
RING Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXW vs. RING - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF (RING). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	GDXW	RING	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	1.49	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.55	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.40	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.45	0.10	+0.35

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. RING - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -36.83%, smaller than the maximum RING drawdown of -79.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and RING.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXW	RING	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-36.83%	-79.47%	+42.64%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-30.11%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.11%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-47.94%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-52.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-32.99%	-25.71%	-7.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.45%	-47.41%	+33.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	11.64%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	GDXW	RING	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	14.98%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	37.38%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	61.39%	45.90%	+15.49%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	61.39%	36.46%	+24.93%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	61.39%	36.53%	+24.86%

GDXW vs. RING - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXW has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than RING's 0.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXW vs. RING - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 39.39%, more than RING's 0.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GDXW Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF	39.39%	7.48%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
RING iShares MSCI Global Gold Miners ETF	0.83%	0.84%	1.43%	2.01%	2.29%	2.38%	0.83%	0.83%	0.70%	0.42%	1.41%	0.96%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXW and RING in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, GDXW and RING move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, GDXW or RING?

On fees, RING is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXW or RING?

RING is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXW or RING?

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 39.39%, compared with 0.83% for RING.

What is the main difference between GDXW and RING?

They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for GDXW and 0.39% for RING.