PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXW vs. GOOW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXW vs. GOOW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -20.04% return, which is significantly lower than GOOW's 13.56% return.


GDXW

1D
-3.84%
1M
-6.91%
6M
-28.00%
YTD
-20.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

GOOW

1D
7.98%
1M
-1.82%
6M
3.91%
YTD
13.56%
1Y
103.29%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
92.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.31M$1.39M$2.06M
$1.99M$1.77M$2.25M

GDXW vs. GOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
GDXW
Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF
-20.04%25.26%
GOOW
Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF
13.56%15.68%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and GOOW is 0.23, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025

0.23

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXW vs. GOOW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GDXW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


GOOW
GOOW Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GOOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GOOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
GOOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
GOOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
GOOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GDXW vs. GOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF (GOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXWGOOWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.85

GDXW vs. GOOW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. GOOW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -46.79%, which is greater than GOOW's maximum drawdown of -25.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and GOOW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXWGOOWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.79%

-25.44%

-21.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.44%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.67%

-14.60%

-29.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.25%

-6.41%

-12.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

9.24%

Volatility

GDXW vs. GOOW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXWGOOWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

30.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.28%

39.64%

+21.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.28%

39.39%

+21.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.28%

39.39%

+21.89%

GDXW vs. GOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GDXW and GOOW have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

GDXW vs. GOOW - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.35%, more than GOOW's 42.80% yield.


PositionTTM2025
GDXW
Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF
59.35%7.48%
GOOW
Roundhill GOOGL WeeklyPay™ ETF
42.80%19.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


GDXW and GOOW have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDXW and GOOW have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 59.35%, compared with 42.80% for GOOW.

GDXW is categorized as Gold, while GOOW is Derivative Income.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXW and GOOW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer