PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GDXW vs. CHPY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GDXW vs. CHPY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXW achieves a -20.04% return, which is significantly lower than CHPY's 55.50% return.


GDXW

1D
-3.84%
1M
-6.91%
6M
-28.00%
YTD
-20.04%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

CHPY

1D
0.27%
1M
-11.10%
6M
39.35%
YTD
55.50%
1Y
93.51%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
95.90%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$53.10M$56.24M$62.00M
$1.31M$1.39M$2.06M

GDXW vs. CHPY - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between GDXW and CHPY is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 30, 2025

0.41

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GDXW vs. CHPY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GDXW

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


CHPY
CHPY Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
CHPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHPY Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CHPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHPY Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GDXW vs. CHPY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Roundhill Gold Miners Weeklypay ETF (GDXW) and YieldMax Semiconductor Portfolio Option Income ETF (CHPY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GDXWCHPYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.63

GDXW vs. CHPY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GDXW vs. CHPY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXW drawdown since its inception was -46.79%, which is greater than CHPY's maximum drawdown of -27.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXW and CHPY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GDXWCHPYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.79%

-27.64%

-19.15%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-27.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.67%

-20.81%

-22.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.25%

-3.03%

-16.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.88%

Volatility

GDXW vs. CHPY - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GDXWCHPYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

17.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

34.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

61.28%

38.28%

+23.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

61.28%

39.15%

+22.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.28%

39.15%

+22.13%

GDXW vs. CHPY - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both GDXW and CHPY have an expense ratio of 0.99%.


Dividends

GDXW vs. CHPY - Dividend Comparison

GDXW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 59.35%, more than CHPY's 38.69% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


GDXW and CHPY have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.99% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GDXW and CHPY have the same expense ratio: 0.99% per year.

GDXW has the higher dividend yield at 59.35%, compared with 38.69% for CHPY.

GDXW is categorized as Gold, while CHPY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Roundhill and YieldMax.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GDXW and CHPY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer