GDXU vs. TMF

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GDXU (MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXU is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, GDXU returned -14.73%/yr vs -31.10%/yr for TMF. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXU charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.

Performance

GDXU vs. TMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXU achieves a -56.00% return, which is significantly lower than TMF's -5.18% return.

GDXU

• 1D: 8.84%
• 1M: -50.11%
• YTD: -56.00%
• 6M: -55.92%
• 1Y: 30.95%
• 3Y*: 37.87%
• 5Y*: -14.73%
• 10Y*: —

TMF

• 1D: -0.93%
• 1M: 3.29%
• YTD: -5.18%
• 6M: -5.04%
• 1Y: -4.90%
• 3Y*: -19.82%
• 5Y*: -31.10%
• 10Y*: -16.87%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXU vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040	-56.00%	796.47%	-18.60%	-21.36%	-62.82%	-54.93%	4.32%
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF	-5.18%	-2.94%	-35.95%	-13.01%	-72.60%	-19.80%	2.93%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXU and TMF is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.18
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2020	0.18

GDXU vs. TMF - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GDXU	TMF
Basic Materials	100.0%	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	18.4%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GDXU vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXU

GDXU Risk / Return Rank: 19
GDXU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 13
GDXU Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
GDXU Omega Ratio Rank: 29
GDXU Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
GDXU Martin Ratio Rank: 14

TMF

TMF Risk / Return Rank: 8
TMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
TMF Martin Ratio Rank: 8

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXU vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDXU	TMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.22	-0.17	+0.39
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	-0.05	+1.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.18	0.99	+0.18
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.37	-0.19	+0.56
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.80	-0.41	+1.22

GDXU vs. TMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXU Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is higher than the TMF Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXU and TMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDXU vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXU drawdown since its inception was -94.39%, roughly equal to the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXU and TMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXU	TMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-94.39%	-92.89%	-1.50%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-83.97%	-26.51%	-57.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-83.97%	-56.31%	-27.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-92.44%	-88.81%	-3.63%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-92.89%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-79.58%	-92.15%	+12.57%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.77%	-43.70%	-26.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	38.59%	11.96%	+26.63%

Volatility

GDXU vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040 (GDXU) has a higher volatility of 54.28% compared to Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF) at 8.43%. This indicates that GDXU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDXU	TMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	54.28%	8.43%	+45.85%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	123.72%	19.46%	+104.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	142.00%	28.49%	+113.51%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	111.92%	46.72%	+65.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	110.82%	43.92%	+66.90%

GDXU vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXU has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXU vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison

GDXU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
GDXU MicroSectors Gold Miners 3X Leveraged ETNs due June 29, 2040	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF	4.11%	4.06%	4.29%	2.82%	1.62%	0.13%	2.23%	0.94%	1.49%	0.41%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXU and TMF in my portfolio?

GDXU and TMF have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDXU or TMF?

GDXU has higher volatility (54.28%) compared to TMF (8.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXU dropped -94.39% vs TMF's -92.89%.

Which ETF is better, GDXU or TMF?

On 5-year performance, GDXU leads with -14.73% vs -31.10% for TMF. On fees, GDXU is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, TMF has been the lower-risk option at 8.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDXU or TMF?

Over the 5-year period, GDXU has performed better with a -14.73% return vs -31.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXU or TMF?

GDXU is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for TMF.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXU or TMF?

TMF has the higher dividend yield at 4.11%, compared with 0.00% for GDXU.

What is the main difference between GDXU and TMF?

GDXU is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. GDXU tracks S-Network MicroSectors Gold Miners Index, while TMF tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: BMO and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for GDXU and 1.01% for TMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDXU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.22 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.