GDXJ vs. BLOK

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GDXJ (VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF) and BLOK (Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GDXJ is a Gold fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index, while BLOK is a Blockchain fund actively managed by Amplify. GDXJ is passively managed, while BLOK is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, GDXJ returned 16.23%/yr vs 11.50%/yr for BLOK. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GDXJ charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BLOK.

Performance

GDXJ vs. BLOK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GDXJ achieves a -8.37% return, which is significantly lower than BLOK's 12.57% return.

GDXJ

• 1D: 3.15%
• 1M: -19.14%
• YTD: -8.37%
• 6M: -6.68%
• 1Y: 51.06%
• 3Y*: 44.17%
• 5Y*: 16.23%
• 10Y*: 12.00%

BLOK

• 1D: 1.33%
• 1M: -0.28%
• YTD: 12.57%
• 6M: 5.60%
• 1Y: 24.42%
• 3Y*: 50.68%
• 5Y*: 11.50%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GDXJ vs. BLOK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	-8.37%	172.28%	15.67%	7.12%	-14.53%	-21.25%	30.40%	40.44%	-14.63%
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	12.57%	32.64%	53.12%	99.62%	-62.36%	30.76%	90.17%	29.54%	-25.38%

Correlation

The correlation between GDXJ and BLOK is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.36
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.30
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.32
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 17, 2018	0.26

GDXJ vs. BLOK - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GDXJ	BLOK
Basic Materials	100.0%	-
Communication Services	-	5.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	6.7%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	55.3%
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	1.0%
Real Estate	-	0.0%
Technology	-	31.8%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

GDXJ vs. BLOK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GDXJ

GDXJ Risk / Return Rank: 31
GDXJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
GDXJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
GDXJ Omega Ratio Rank: 33
GDXJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
GDXJ Martin Ratio Rank: 28

BLOK

BLOK Risk / Return Rank: 20
BLOK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 21
BLOK Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
BLOK Omega Ratio Rank: 22
BLOK Calmar Ratio Rank: 19
BLOK Martin Ratio Rank: 17

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GDXJ vs. BLOK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) and Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GDXJ	BLOK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.00	0.63	+0.37
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	1.08	+0.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.20	1.13	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.30	0.69	+0.61
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.55	1.49	+2.06

GDXJ vs. BLOK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GDXJ Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the BLOK Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GDXJ and BLOK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GDXJ vs. BLOK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GDXJ drawdown since its inception was -88.66%, which is greater than BLOK's maximum drawdown of -73.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GDXJ and BLOK.

Drawdown Indicators

	GDXJ	BLOK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-88.66%	-73.33%	-15.33%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-39.47%	-35.64%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-39.47%	-35.64%	-3.83%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-49.76%	-73.33%	+23.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-57.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.25%	-12.97%	-20.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-60.45%	-26.03%	-34.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.41%	16.41%	-2.00%

Volatility

GDXJ vs. BLOK - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF (GDXJ) has a higher volatility of 19.46% compared to Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF (BLOK) at 13.34%. This indicates that GDXJ's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BLOK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GDXJ	BLOK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.46%	13.34%	+6.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	43.41%	30.02%	+13.39%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	51.54%	39.18%	+12.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	41.50%	42.53%	-1.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.23%	39.05%	+5.18%

GDXJ vs. BLOK - Expense Ratio Comparison

GDXJ has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than BLOK's 0.70% expense ratio.

Dividends

GDXJ vs. BLOK - Dividend Comparison

GDXJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than BLOK's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLOK Amplify Blockchain Technology ETF	0.64%	0.72%	6.00%	1.15%	0.00%	14.31%	1.88%	2.05%	1.30%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
GDXJ VanEck Junior Gold Miners ETF	2.54%	2.33%	2.61%	0.72%	0.51%	1.78%	1.58%	0.39%	0.45%	0.03%	4.78%	0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GDXJ and BLOK in my portfolio?

GDXJ and BLOK have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GDXJ or BLOK?

GDXJ has higher volatility (19.46%) compared to BLOK (13.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GDXJ dropped -88.66% vs BLOK's -73.33%.

Which ETF is better, GDXJ or BLOK?

On 5-year performance, GDXJ leads with 16.23% vs 11.50% for BLOK. On fees, GDXJ is cheaper at 0.52% per year. On volatility, BLOK has been the lower-risk option at 13.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GDXJ or BLOK?

Over the 5-year period, GDXJ has performed better with a 16.23% return vs 11.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GDXJ or BLOK?

GDXJ is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for BLOK.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GDXJ or BLOK?

GDXJ has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.64% for BLOK.

What is the main difference between GDXJ and BLOK?

GDXJ is categorized as Gold, while BLOK is Blockchain. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for GDXJ and 0.70% for BLOK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GDXJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.00 vs 0.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.