GCOZX vs. GLDYX
Compare and contrast key facts about GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX).
GCOZX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 26, 2001. GLDYX is managed by GuideStone Funds. It was launched on Aug 27, 2001.
Performance
GCOZX vs. GLDYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
GCOZX vs. GLDYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOZX GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund | -2.61% | 16.13% | 12.05% | 16.57% | -18.06% | 11.60% | 12.96% | 22.39% | -7.50% | 18.61% |
GLDYX GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund | 0.09% | 5.66% | 4.81% | 5.09% | -4.42% | -0.47% | 3.39% | 4.00% | 1.83% | 1.69% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOZX achieves a -2.61% return, which is significantly lower than GLDYX's 0.09% return. Over the past 10 years, GCOZX has outperformed GLDYX with an annualized return of 8.14%, while GLDYX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.27% annualized return.
GCOZX
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- -2.61%
- 6M
- -1.06%
- 1Y
- 12.48%
- 3Y*
- 11.87%
- 5Y*
- 5.29%
- 10Y*
- 8.14%
GLDYX
- 1D
- 0.08%
- 1M
- -0.42%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 1.20%
- 1Y
- 4.10%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 2.06%
- 10Y*
- 2.27%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GCOZX vs. GLDYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOZX has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDYX's 0.34% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
GCOZX vs. GLDYX — Risk / Return Rank
GCOZX
GLDYX
GCOZX vs. GLDYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) and GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GCOZX | GLDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.01 | 2.86 | -1.85 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.48 | 4.57 | -3.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.67 | -0.46 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.39 | 4.03 | -2.64 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.04 | 17.82 | -11.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GCOZX | GLDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.01 | 2.86 | -1.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.45 | 1.15 | -0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.65 | 1.47 | -0.82 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.65 | -0.24 |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOZX and GLDYX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
GCOZX vs. GLDYX - Dividend Comparison
GCOZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.85%, more than GLDYX's 4.11% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOZX GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund | 9.85% | 9.59% | 3.47% | 3.37% | 9.49% | 6.85% | 4.94% | 9.42% | 4.24% | 4.71% | 5.71% | 19.06% |
GLDYX GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund | 4.11% | 4.32% | 4.31% | 3.36% | 1.72% | 1.02% | 1.70% | 2.49% | 2.87% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.03% |
Drawdowns
GCOZX vs. GLDYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOZX drawdown since its inception was -47.79%, which is greater than GLDYX's maximum drawdown of -11.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOZX and GLDYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOZX | GLDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.79% | -11.73% | -36.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.23% | -1.04% | -8.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.19% | -6.68% | -18.51% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -27.50% | -6.68% | -20.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.91% | -0.65% | -5.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.56% | -2.17% | -4.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 0.23% | +1.89% |
Volatility
GCOZX vs. GLDYX - Volatility Comparison
GuideStone Funds Growth Allocation Fund (GCOZX) has a higher volatility of 5.00% compared to GuideStone Funds Low-Duration Bond Fund (GLDYX) at 0.61%. This indicates that GCOZX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GLDYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| GCOZX | GLDYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.00% | 0.61% | +4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.74% | 0.93% | +6.81% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.77% | 1.44% | +11.33% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.94% | 1.81% | +10.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.66% | 1.55% | +11.11% |