GCOW vs. RSST

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) and RSST (Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while RSST is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Return Stacked. GCOW is passively managed, while RSST is actively managed. Over the past year, GCOW returned 24.86% vs 48.11% for RSST. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. GCOW charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RSST.

Performance

GCOW vs. RSST - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 12.75% return, which is significantly lower than RSST's 14.53% return.

GCOW

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -0.75%
• YTD: 12.75%
• 6M: 13.53%
• 1Y: 24.86%
• 3Y*: 16.79%
• 5Y*: 12.37%
• 10Y*: 10.32%

RSST

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: -4.58%
• YTD: 14.53%
• 6M: 17.56%
• 1Y: 48.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCOW vs. RSST - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	12.75%	27.34%	3.52%	5.02%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	14.53%	19.91%	18.37%	1.58%

Correlation

The correlation between GCOW and RSST is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 6, 2023	0.43

GCOW vs. RSST - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	GCOW	RSST
Energy	24.4%	5.4%
Consumer Defensive	17.1%	6.0%
Healthcare	14.6%	8.2%
Communication Services	14.6%	9.6%
Industrials	12.4%	8.8%
Basic Materials	7.3%	3.4%
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	9.2%
Utilities	4.1%	2.7%
Technology	0.9%	30.7%
Financial Services	-	14.6%
Real Estate	-	1.6%

Return for Risk

GCOW vs. RSST — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCOW

GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 82
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 77
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 78

RSST

RSST Risk / Return Rank: 70
RSST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
RSST Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
RSST Omega Ratio Rank: 64
RSST Calmar Ratio Rank: 83
RSST Martin Ratio Rank: 78

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCOW vs. RSST - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	GCOW	RSST	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.26	1.94	+0.31
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.27	2.35	+0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.39	1.33	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	5.13	3.89	+1.24
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.09	12.98	+0.11

GCOW vs. RSST - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.26, which is comparable to the RSST Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCOW and RSST, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

GCOW vs. RSST - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, which is greater than RSST's maximum drawdown of -30.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and RSST.

Drawdown Indicators

	GCOW	RSST	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.64%	-30.80%	-6.84%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.77%	-11.71%	+6.94%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.35%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.48%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.64%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.24%	-6.59%	+4.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.83%	-6.03%	+0.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	3.51%	-1.63%

Volatility

GCOW vs. RSST - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 2.45%, while Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF (RSST) has a volatility of 8.70%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSST based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	GCOW	RSST	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.45%	8.70%	-6.25%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.96%	17.17%	-9.21%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.85%	23.43%	-12.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.49%	24.47%	-10.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.17%	24.47%	-8.30%

GCOW vs. RSST - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than RSST's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

GCOW vs. RSST - Dividend Comparison

GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, more than RSST's 0.98% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF	4.67%	4.06%	5.14%	5.28%	4.39%	4.23%	4.12%	4.40%	3.94%	2.79%	1.95%
RSST Return Stacked U.S. Stocks & Managed Futures ETF	0.98%	1.12%	0.09%	0.93%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both GCOW and RSST in my portfolio?

GCOW and RSST have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, GCOW or RSST?

RSST has higher volatility (8.70%) compared to GCOW (2.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs RSST's -30.80%.

Which ETF is better, GCOW or RSST?

On 1-year performance, RSST leads with 48.11% vs 24.86% for GCOW. On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, GCOW or RSST?

Over the 1-year period, RSST has performed better with a 48.11% return vs 24.86%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, GCOW or RSST?

GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSST.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, GCOW or RSST?

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.67%, compared with 0.98% for RSST.

What is the main difference between GCOW and RSST?

GCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while RSST is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCOW and 1.04% for RSST.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.26 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.