PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCOW vs. VXUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCOW vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GCOW having a 9.81% annualized return and VXUS not far ahead at 10.12%.


GCOW

1D
-1.71%
1M
-4.17%
YTD
9.29%
6M
10.58%
1Y
22.33%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
12.45%
10Y*
9.81%

VXUS

1D
-0.55%
1M
3.14%
YTD
14.31%
6M
17.16%
1Y
31.59%
3Y*
18.16%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
10.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCOW vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
9.29%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%17.81%-7.99%20.71%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
14.31%32.35%5.08%15.86%-16.08%8.98%10.66%21.75%-14.43%27.46%

Correlation

The correlation between GCOW and VXUS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.57

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.71

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016

0.81

Over the past year, the correlation between GCOW and VXUS has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

GCOW vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GCOW
VXUS

Energy

22.9%
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

17.0%
5.0%

Healthcare

14.8%
7.1%

Communication Services

14.5%
4.4%

Industrials

12.6%
16.1%

Basic Materials

8.1%
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

4.8%
8.4%

Utilities

4.0%
3.2%

Technology

1.3%
18.1%

Financial Services

-

22.3%

Real Estate

-

2.6%

Energy

GCOW
22.9%
VXUS
5.2%

Consumer Defensive

GCOW
17.0%
VXUS
5.0%

Healthcare

GCOW
14.8%
VXUS
7.1%

Communication Services

GCOW
14.5%
VXUS
4.4%

Industrials

GCOW
12.6%
VXUS
16.1%

Basic Materials

GCOW
8.1%
VXUS
7.6%

Consumer Cyclical

GCOW
4.8%
VXUS
8.4%

Utilities

GCOW
4.0%
VXUS
3.2%

Technology

GCOW
1.3%
VXUS
18.1%

Financial Services

GCOW

-

VXUS
22.3%

Real Estate

GCOW

-

VXUS
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCOW vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

VXUS
VXUS Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
VXUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VXUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VXUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
VXUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
VXUS Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCOW vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCOWVXUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.37

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.28

2.82

+1.47

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.81

10.84

+0.97

GCOW vs. VXUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the VXUS Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCOW and VXUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCOW vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, roughly equal to the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and VXUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCOWVXUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.64%

-35.97%

-1.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.24%

-11.27%

+6.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.35%

-13.58%

+1.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

-29.44%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

-35.97%

-1.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.24%

-0.95%

-4.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.83%

-8.20%

+2.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

2.92%

-1.02%

Volatility

GCOW vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 2.75%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCOWVXUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.75%

6.47%

-3.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.26%

14.09%

-5.83%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.04%

16.09%

-5.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.52%

16.22%

-2.70%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.18%

17.20%

-1.02%

GCOW vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCOW vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison

GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than VXUS's 2.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.81%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%0.00%
VXUS
Vanguard Total International Stock ETF
2.66%3.18%3.37%3.24%3.09%3.10%2.14%3.06%3.18%2.73%2.93%2.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCOW and VXUS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VXUS has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to GCOW (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs VXUS's -35.97%.

On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 10.12% vs 9.81% for GCOW. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 10.12% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 2.66% for VXUS.

GCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCOW and 0.05% for VXUS.

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCOW and VXUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer