GCOW vs. VXUS
GCOW (Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF) and VXUS (Vanguard Total International Stock ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - GCOW is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while VXUS is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, GCOW returned 9.81%/yr vs 10.12%/yr for VXUS. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. GCOW charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for VXUS.
Performance
GCOW vs. VXUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GCOW achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than VXUS's 14.31% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with GCOW having a 9.81% annualized return and VXUS not far ahead at 10.12%.
GCOW
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -4.17%
- YTD
- 9.29%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- 22.33%
- 3Y*
- 14.99%
- 5Y*
- 12.45%
- 10Y*
- 9.81%
VXUS
- 1D
- -0.55%
- 1M
- 3.14%
- YTD
- 14.31%
- 6M
- 17.16%
- 1Y
- 31.59%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 9.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.12%
GCOW vs. VXUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 9.29% | 27.34% | 3.52% | 13.95% | 5.49% | 14.58% | -4.33% | 17.81% | -7.99% | 20.71% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 14.31% | 32.35% | 5.08% | 15.86% | -16.08% | 8.98% | 10.66% | 21.75% | -14.43% | 27.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between GCOW and VXUS is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 23, 2016 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between GCOW and VXUS has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
GCOW vs. VXUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
GCOW
VXUS
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Communication Services
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Technology
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Energy
GCOW
VXUS
Consumer Defensive
GCOW
VXUS
Healthcare
GCOW
VXUS
Communication Services
GCOW
VXUS
Industrials
GCOW
VXUS
Basic Materials
GCOW
VXUS
Consumer Cyclical
GCOW
VXUS
Utilities
GCOW
VXUS
Technology
GCOW
VXUS
Financial Services
GCOW
-
VXUS
Real Estate
GCOW
-
VXUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GCOW vs. VXUS — Risk / Return Rank
GCOW
VXUS
GCOW vs. VXUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GCOW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.37 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.28 | 2.82 | +1.47 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.81 | 10.84 | +0.97 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GCOW vs. VXUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, roughly equal to the maximum VXUS drawdown of -35.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and VXUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GCOW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.64% | -35.97% | -1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.24% | -11.27% | +6.03% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.35% | -13.58% | +1.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.48% | -29.44% | +7.96% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.64% | -35.97% | -1.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.24% | -0.95% | -4.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.83% | -8.20% | +2.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 2.92% | -1.02% |
Volatility
GCOW vs. VXUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) is 2.75%, while Vanguard Total International Stock ETF (VXUS) has a volatility of 6.47%. This indicates that GCOW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VXUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GCOW | VXUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.75% | 6.47% | -3.72% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.26% | 14.09% | -5.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.04% | 16.09% | -5.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.52% | 16.22% | -2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 17.20% | -1.02% |
GCOW vs. VXUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than VXUS's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
GCOW vs. VXUS - Dividend Comparison
GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.81%, more than VXUS's 2.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GCOW Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF | 4.81% | 4.06% | 5.14% | 5.28% | 4.39% | 4.23% | 4.12% | 4.40% | 3.94% | 2.79% | 1.95% | 0.00% |
VXUS Vanguard Total International Stock ETF | 2.66% | 3.18% | 3.37% | 3.24% | 3.09% | 3.10% | 2.14% | 3.06% | 3.18% | 2.73% | 2.93% | 2.83% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GCOW and VXUS have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
VXUS has higher volatility (6.47%) compared to GCOW (2.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs VXUS's -35.97%.
On 10-year performance, VXUS leads with 10.12% vs 9.81% for GCOW. On fees, VXUS is cheaper at 0.05% per year. On volatility, GCOW has been the lower-risk option at 2.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VXUS has performed better with a 10.12% return vs 9.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VXUS is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for GCOW.
GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.81%, compared with 2.66% for VXUS.
GCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while VXUS is Global Equities. GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while VXUS tracks FTSE Global All Cap ex US Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCOW and 0.05% for VXUS.
GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for GCOW and VXUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer