PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCOW vs. HERD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCOW vs. HERD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GCOW having a 14.77% return and HERD slightly higher at 14.97%.


GCOW

1D
-0.73%
1M
5.47%
6M
7.25%
YTD
14.77%
1Y
27.77%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
13.35%
10Y*
9.89%
ALL TIME*
10.57%

HERD

1D
-0.45%
1M
4.23%
6M
10.58%
YTD
14.97%
1Y
29.21%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
10.62%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$12.71M$12.72M$12.45M
$194.03K$197.87K$182.95K

GCOW vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
14.77%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%5.66%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
14.97%19.07%2.91%20.72%-6.96%28.58%10.71%6.95%

Correlation

The correlation between GCOW and HERD is 0.67, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.69

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 7, 2019

0.65

The correlation between GCOW and HERD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

GCOW vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GCOW
HERD

Consumer Defensive

22.3%
10.1%

Healthcare

17.1%
16.9%

Communication Services

15.0%
8.8%

Energy

11.7%
10.4%

Industrials

10.7%
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

7.5%
17.8%

Utilities

6.8%
1.3%

Basic Materials

3.6%
6.2%

Technology

2.9%
16.3%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

0.4%

Consumer Defensive

GCOW
22.3%
HERD
10.1%

Healthcare

GCOW
17.1%
HERD
16.9%

Communication Services

GCOW
15.0%
HERD
8.8%

Energy

GCOW
11.7%
HERD
10.4%

Industrials

GCOW
10.7%
HERD
11.9%

Consumer Cyclical

GCOW
7.5%
HERD
17.8%

Utilities

GCOW
6.8%
HERD
1.3%

Basic Materials

GCOW
3.6%
HERD
6.2%

Technology

GCOW
2.9%
HERD
16.3%

Financial Services

GCOW

-

HERD
0.0%

Real Estate

GCOW

-

HERD
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCOW vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

GCOW vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


GCOWHERDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.29

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.44

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.61

5.01

-1.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.15

15.56

-4.41

GCOW vs. HERD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the HERD Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCOW and HERD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

GCOW vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, roughly equal to the maximum HERD drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and HERD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCOWHERDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.64%

-39.41%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.83%

-5.68%

-2.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.35%

-18.90%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

-21.60%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-0.70%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.82%

-4.50%

-1.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.53%

1.83%

+0.70%

Volatility

GCOW vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) have volatilities of 3.59% and 3.60%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCOWHERDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.59%

3.60%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.54%

8.72%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.99%

11.83%

-0.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.55%

17.68%

-4.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.00%

20.36%

-4.36%

GCOW vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCOW vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison

GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.58%, more than HERD's 2.73% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.58%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
2.73%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCOW and HERD have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HERD has higher volatility (3.60%) compared to GCOW (3.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs HERD's -39.41%.

On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 13.35% vs 10.62% for HERD. On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 13.35% return vs 10.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.58%, compared with 2.73% for HERD.

GCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HERD is Global Equities. GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCOW and 0.73% for HERD.

GCOW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCOW and HERD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer