PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
GCOW vs. HERD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

GCOW vs. HERD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with GCOW having a 12.18% return and HERD slightly lower at 12.05%.


GCOW

1D
-0.56%
1M
0.09%
YTD
12.18%
6M
13.23%
1Y
27.12%
3Y*
17.41%
5Y*
12.34%
10Y*
9.91%

HERD

1D
-0.52%
1M
3.45%
YTD
12.05%
6M
12.85%
1Y
29.32%
3Y*
17.33%
5Y*
9.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

GCOW vs. HERD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
12.18%27.34%3.52%13.95%5.49%14.58%-4.33%7.19%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
12.05%19.07%2.91%20.72%-6.96%28.58%10.71%7.36%

Correlation

The correlation between GCOW and HERD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 8, 2019

0.65

The correlation between GCOW and HERD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.72 - a consistent structural relationship.

GCOW vs. HERD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
GCOW
HERD

Energy

24.4%
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

17.1%
8.2%

Healthcare

14.6%
14.7%

Communication Services

14.6%
8.3%

Industrials

12.4%
13.4%

Basic Materials

7.3%
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

4.6%
15.6%

Utilities

4.1%
0.8%

Technology

0.9%
18.0%

Financial Services

-

0.0%

Real Estate

-

0.3%

Energy

GCOW
24.4%
HERD
15.9%

Consumer Defensive

GCOW
17.1%
HERD
8.2%

Healthcare

GCOW
14.6%
HERD
14.7%

Communication Services

GCOW
14.6%
HERD
8.3%

Industrials

GCOW
12.4%
HERD
13.4%

Basic Materials

GCOW
7.3%
HERD
4.7%

Consumer Cyclical

GCOW
4.6%
HERD
15.6%

Utilities

GCOW
4.1%
HERD
0.8%

Technology

GCOW
0.9%
HERD
18.0%

Financial Services

GCOW

-

HERD
0.0%

Real Estate

GCOW

-

HERD
0.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

GCOW vs. HERD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GCOW
GCOW Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
GCOW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GCOW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
GCOW Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
GCOW Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
GCOW Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank

HERD
HERD Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
HERD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HERD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
HERD Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
HERD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
HERD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

GCOW vs. HERD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GCOWHERDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.45

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.71

5.19

+0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.05

17.73

-2.68

GCOW vs. HERD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GCOW Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the HERD Sharpe Ratio of 2.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GCOW and HERD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


GCOWHERDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.52

2.54

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

0.56

+0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.63

-0.04

Drawdowns

GCOW vs. HERD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GCOW drawdown since its inception was -37.64%, roughly equal to the maximum HERD drawdown of -39.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GCOW and HERD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


GCOWHERDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.64%

-39.41%

+1.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.77%

-5.68%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.35%

-18.90%

+6.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.48%

-21.60%

+0.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

-0.67%

-2.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.84%

-4.55%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

1.66%

+0.15%

Volatility

GCOW vs. HERD - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF (GCOW) and Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF (HERD) have volatilities of 2.85% and 2.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


GCOWHERDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.85%

2.92%

-0.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.99%

7.74%

+0.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.81%

11.62%

-0.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.49%

17.76%

-4.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.20%

20.50%

-4.30%

GCOW vs. HERD - Expense Ratio Comparison

GCOW has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HERD's 0.73% expense ratio.


Dividends

GCOW vs. HERD - Dividend Comparison

GCOW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.43%, more than HERD's 3.13% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
4.43%4.06%5.14%5.28%4.39%4.23%4.12%4.40%3.94%2.79%1.95%
HERD
Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds ETF
3.13%3.75%2.43%2.54%2.50%2.02%1.95%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


GCOW and HERD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HERD has higher volatility (2.92%) compared to GCOW (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, GCOW dropped -37.64% vs HERD's -39.41%.

On 5-year performance, GCOW leads with 12.34% vs 9.95% for HERD. On fees, GCOW is cheaper at 0.60% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GCOW has performed better with a 12.34% return vs 9.95%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GCOW is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.73% for HERD.

GCOW has the higher dividend yield at 4.43%, compared with 3.13% for HERD.

GCOW is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while HERD is Global Equities. GCOW tracks Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividends Index, while HERD tracks Pacer Cash Cows Fund of Funds Index. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for GCOW and 0.73% for HERD.

HERD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.54 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for GCOW and HERD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer