GC=F vs. VOO
GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset, while VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
GC=F vs. VOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
GC=F
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VOO
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- 0.24%
- YTD
- 8.72%
- 6M
- 8.77%
- 1Y
- 24.91%
- 3Y*
- 21.45%
- 5Y*
- 13.49%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
GC=F vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GC=F Gold Futures | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 5.91% |
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF | 8.72% | 17.82% | 24.98% | 26.32% | -13.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between GC=F and VOO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2022 | -0.05 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GC=F vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank
GC=F
VOO
GC=F vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Futures (GC=F) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GC=F | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.80 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.85 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 0.88 | — |
Drawdowns
GC=F vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GC=F | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -33.99% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.69% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.52% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.99% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -2.66% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -3.69% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.92% | — |
Volatility
GC=F vs. VOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GC=F | VOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.73% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.31% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 12.08% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 16.85% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 18.03% | — |
Frequently Asked Questions
GC=F and VOO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GC=F and VOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer