PortfoliosLab logo
GC=F vs. BZ=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GC=F and BZ=F is 0.02, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.0

Performance

GC=F vs. BZ=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold (GC=F) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

200.00%400.00%600.00%800.00%1,000.00%1,200.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
1,115.85%
110.27%
GC=F
BZ=F

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GC=F:

2.27

BZ=F:

-0.65

Sortino Ratio

GC=F:

2.92

BZ=F:

-0.76

Omega Ratio

GC=F:

1.41

BZ=F:

0.91

Calmar Ratio

GC=F:

4.76

BZ=F:

-0.31

Martin Ratio

GC=F:

12.08

BZ=F:

-1.18

Ulcer Index

GC=F:

3.15%

BZ=F:

14.82%

Daily Std Dev

GC=F:

16.53%

BZ=F:

26.26%

Max Drawdown

GC=F:

-44.36%

BZ=F:

-86.77%

Current Drawdown

GC=F:

-2.23%

BZ=F:

-54.86%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GC=F achieves a 26.66% return, which is significantly higher than BZ=F's -11.66% return. Over the past 10 years, GC=F has outperformed BZ=F with an annualized return of 9.39%, while BZ=F has yielded a comparatively lower 0.19% annualized return.


GC=F

YTD

26.66%

1M

10.24%

6M

21.50%

1Y

42.94%

5Y*

12.61%

10Y*

9.39%

BZ=F

YTD

-11.66%

1M

-10.64%

6M

-12.81%

1Y

-25.92%

5Y*

23.58%

10Y*

0.19%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GC=F vs. BZ=F — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GC=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GC=F is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

BZ=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BZ=F is 1010
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BZ=F is 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BZ=F is 99
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BZ=F is 66
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BZ=F is 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BZ=F is 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GC=F vs. BZ=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold (GC=F) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.66, compared to the broader market0-0.500.000.501.001.502.00
GC=F: 2.66
BZ=F: -0.74
The chart of Sortino ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 3.40, compared to the broader market0-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.50
GC=F: 3.40
BZ=F: -0.90
The chart of Omega ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.50, compared to the broader market01.001.101.201.30
GC=F: 1.50
BZ=F: 0.89
The chart of Calmar ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 5.33, compared to the broader market00.001.002.003.004.00
GC=F: 5.33
BZ=F: -0.35
The chart of Martin ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 15.07, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
GC=F: 15.07
BZ=F: -1.33

The current GC=F Sharpe Ratio is 2.27, which is higher than the BZ=F Sharpe Ratio of -0.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GC=F and BZ=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.66
-0.74
GC=F
BZ=F

Drawdowns

GC=F vs. BZ=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GC=F drawdown since its inception was -44.36%, smaller than the maximum BZ=F drawdown of -86.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC=F and BZ=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-60.00%-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-2.23%
-54.86%
GC=F
BZ=F

Volatility

GC=F vs. BZ=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gold (GC=F) is 8.73%, while Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) has a volatility of 12.94%. This indicates that GC=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BZ=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
8.73%
12.94%
GC=F
BZ=F