PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GC=F vs. BZ=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GC=FBZ=F
YTD Return12.86%12.16%
1Y Return21.16%16.24%
3Y Return (Ann)8.40%4.68%
5Y Return (Ann)9.60%5.14%
10Y Return (Ann)5.06%-2.51%
Sharpe Ratio1.450.00
Daily Std Dev13.89%25.05%
Max Drawdown-44.36%-86.77%
Current Drawdown-4.36%-40.85%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between GC=F and BZ=F is 0.06, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GC=F vs. BZ=F - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, GC=F achieves a 12.86% return, which is significantly higher than BZ=F's 12.16% return. Over the past 10 years, GC=F has outperformed BZ=F with an annualized return of 5.06%, while BZ=F has yielded a comparatively lower -2.51% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%600.00%700.00%800.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
749.84%
175.54%
GC=F
BZ=F

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Gold

Crude Oil Brent

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GC=F vs. BZ=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold (GC=F) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GC=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.59, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.001.59
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.18, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.002.18
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.30, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.30
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.87, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.501.87
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 7.53, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.007.53
BZ=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 0.09, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.09
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 0.29, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.000.29
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 1.04, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.04
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 0.05, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.500.05
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for BZ=F, currently valued at 0.18, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.000.18

GC=F vs. BZ=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GC=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the BZ=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.00. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GC=F and BZ=F.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
1.59
0.09
GC=F
BZ=F

Drawdowns

GC=F vs. BZ=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GC=F drawdown since its inception was -44.36%, smaller than the maximum BZ=F drawdown of -86.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC=F and BZ=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-50.00%-40.00%-30.00%-20.00%-10.00%0.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
-4.36%
-40.85%
GC=F
BZ=F

Volatility

GC=F vs. BZ=F - Volatility Comparison

Gold (GC=F) and Crude Oil Brent (BZ=F) have volatilities of 4.89% and 4.92%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
4.89%
4.92%
GC=F
BZ=F