PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GC=F vs. HG=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

GC=F vs. HG=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold (GC=F) and Copper (HG=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
15.26%
-15.19%
GC=F
HG=F

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GC=F achieves a 30.49% return, which is significantly higher than HG=F's 5.26% return. Over the past 10 years, GC=F has outperformed HG=F with an annualized return of 7.45%, while HG=F has yielded a comparatively lower 3.11% annualized return.


GC=F

YTD

30.49%

1M

-1.93%

6M

15.26%

1Y

35.15%

5Y (annualized)

11.47%

10Y (annualized)

7.45%

HG=F

YTD

5.26%

1M

-6.06%

6M

-15.20%

1Y

8.44%

5Y (annualized)

8.91%

10Y (annualized)

3.11%

Key characteristics


GC=FHG=F
Sharpe Ratio2.290.20
Sortino Ratio2.920.43
Omega Ratio1.421.05
Calmar Ratio4.040.18
Martin Ratio11.980.38
Ulcer Index2.69%11.96%
Daily Std Dev14.24%22.09%
Max Drawdown-44.36%-62.54%
Current Drawdown-3.49%-20.21%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between GC=F and HG=F is 0.09, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GC=F vs. HG=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold (GC=F) and Copper (HG=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.19, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.190.22
The chart of Sortino ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.80, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.002.502.800.46
The chart of Omega ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.40, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.401.06
The chart of Calmar ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 3.86, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.003.860.19
The chart of Martin ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 11.35, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.0011.350.40
GC=F
HG=F

The current GC=F Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the HG=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GC=F and HG=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.19
0.22
GC=F
HG=F

Drawdowns

GC=F vs. HG=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GC=F drawdown since its inception was -44.36%, smaller than the maximum HG=F drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC=F and HG=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.49%
-20.21%
GC=F
HG=F

Volatility

GC=F vs. HG=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gold (GC=F) is 5.41%, while Copper (HG=F) has a volatility of 8.56%. This indicates that GC=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HG=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
5.41%
8.56%
GC=F
HG=F