PortfoliosLab logo
GC=F vs. HG=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between GC=F and HG=F is 0.03, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.0

Performance

GC=F vs. HG=F - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Gold (GC=F) and Copper (HG=F). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%500.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
539.62%
98.58%
GC=F
HG=F

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

GC=F:

2.34

HG=F:

0.22

Sortino Ratio

GC=F:

3.01

HG=F:

0.46

Omega Ratio

GC=F:

1.42

HG=F:

1.06

Calmar Ratio

GC=F:

4.95

HG=F:

0.24

Martin Ratio

GC=F:

12.57

HG=F:

0.61

Ulcer Index

GC=F:

3.15%

HG=F:

9.20%

Daily Std Dev

GC=F:

16.66%

HG=F:

25.57%

Max Drawdown

GC=F:

-44.36%

HG=F:

-62.54%

Current Drawdown

GC=F:

-1.17%

HG=F:

-6.49%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, GC=F achieves a 28.04% return, which is significantly higher than HG=F's 21.20% return. Over the past 10 years, GC=F has outperformed HG=F with an annualized return of 9.46%, while HG=F has yielded a comparatively lower 5.74% annualized return.


GC=F

YTD

28.04%

1M

11.33%

6M

23.09%

1Y

44.82%

5Y*

12.55%

10Y*

9.46%

HG=F

YTD

21.20%

1M

-5.88%

6M

12.98%

1Y

9.25%

5Y*

15.34%

10Y*

5.74%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

GC=F vs. HG=F — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

GC=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of GC=F is 9494
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of GC=F is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

HG=F
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of HG=F is 5858
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of HG=F is 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of HG=F is 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of HG=F is 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of HG=F is 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of HG=F is 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

GC=F vs. HG=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold (GC=F) and Copper (HG=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The chart of Sharpe ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.84, compared to the broader market-0.500.000.501.001.502.00
GC=F: 2.84
HG=F: 0.35
The chart of Sortino ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 3.63, compared to the broader market0.001.002.00
GC=F: 3.63
HG=F: 0.62
The chart of Omega ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.54, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.30
GC=F: 1.54
HG=F: 1.08
The chart of Calmar ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 5.76, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
GC=F: 5.76
HG=F: 0.37
The chart of Martin ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 16.87, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.00
GC=F: 16.87
HG=F: 0.98

The current GC=F Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is higher than the HG=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of GC=F and HG=F, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.000.001.002.003.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
2.84
0.35
GC=F
HG=F

Drawdowns

GC=F vs. HG=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GC=F drawdown since its inception was -44.36%, smaller than the maximum HG=F drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC=F and HG=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-1.17%
-6.49%
GC=F
HG=F

Volatility

GC=F vs. HG=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gold (GC=F) is 8.95%, while Copper (HG=F) has a volatility of 13.76%. This indicates that GC=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HG=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
8.95%
13.76%
GC=F
HG=F