PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Risk Analysis
Optimization
Factor Model
See All Tools
Portfolio Analysis
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
GC=F vs. HG=F
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


GC=FHG=F
YTD Return12.86%13.14%
1Y Return21.16%19.39%
3Y Return (Ann)8.40%0.86%
5Y Return (Ann)9.60%10.04%
10Y Return (Ann)5.06%3.18%
Sharpe Ratio1.450.62
Daily Std Dev13.89%19.64%
Max Drawdown-44.36%-62.54%
Current Drawdown-4.36%-14.23%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.1

The correlation between GC=F and HG=F is 0.08, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Performance

GC=F vs. HG=F - Performance Comparison

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with GC=F having a 12.86% return and HG=F slightly higher at 13.14%. Over the past 10 years, GC=F has outperformed HG=F with an annualized return of 5.06%, while HG=F has yielded a comparatively lower 3.18% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


0.00%100.00%200.00%300.00%400.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
342.28%
78.66%
GC=F
HG=F

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Gold

Copper

Risk-Adjusted Performance

GC=F vs. HG=F - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold (GC=F) and Copper (HG=F). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


GC=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.53, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.001.53
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 2.12, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.002.12
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.28, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.28
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 1.88, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.501.88
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GC=F, currently valued at 7.63, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.007.63
HG=F
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 0.87, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.502.000.87
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 1.33, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.001.33
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 1.17, compared to the broader market1.001.101.201.301.401.17
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 0.59, compared to the broader market0.000.501.001.500.59
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for HG=F, currently valued at 3.42, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.003.42

GC=F vs. HG=F - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current GC=F Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the HG=F Sharpe Ratio of 0.62. The chart below compares the 12-month rolling Sharpe Ratio of GC=F and HG=F.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
1.53
0.87
GC=F
HG=F

Drawdowns

GC=F vs. HG=F - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum GC=F drawdown since its inception was -44.36%, smaller than the maximum HG=F drawdown of -62.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC=F and HG=F. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-25.00%-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
-4.36%
-14.23%
GC=F
HG=F

Volatility

GC=F vs. HG=F - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Gold (GC=F) is 4.89%, while Copper (HG=F) has a volatility of 7.56%. This indicates that GC=F experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HG=F based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%2024FebruaryMarchAprilMayJune
4.89%
7.56%
GC=F
HG=F