GC=F vs. GOLD
GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset, while GOLD (Barrick Mining Corporation) is a stock. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
GC=F vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GC=F achieves a 4.09% return, which is significantly lower than GOLD's 21.38% return.
GC=F
- 1D
- 1.48%
- 1M
- -1.17%
- YTD
- 4.09%
- 6M
- 6.90%
- 1Y
- 33.46%
- 3Y*
- 31.99%
- 5Y*
- 18.96%
- 10Y*
- 13.72%
GOLD
- 1D
- 4.46%
- 1M
- -4.06%
- YTD
- 21.38%
- 6M
- 34.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GC=F vs. GOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GC=F Gold Futures | 4.09% | 3.32% |
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation | 21.38% | 14.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between GC=F and GOLD is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2025 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GC=F vs. GOLD — Risk / Return Rank
GC=F
GOLD
GC=F vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Futures (GC=F) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| GC=F | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.83 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.59 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| GC=F | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.22 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.62 | 1.58 | -0.96 |
Drawdowns
GC=F vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GC=F drawdown since its inception was -44.36%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -40.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC=F and GOLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GC=F | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.36% | -40.58% | -3.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.73% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.34% | -35.57% | +20.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.03% | -17.40% | +4.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.13% | — | — |
Volatility
GC=F vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GC=F | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.73% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.11% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.50% | 58.88% | -32.38% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 58.88% | -40.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.44% | 58.88% | -42.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GC=F and GOLD have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GC=F and GOLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer