GC=F vs. GOLD
GC=F (Gold Futures) is an asset, while GOLD (Barrick Mining Corporation) is a stock. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently.
Performance
GC=F vs. GOLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, GC=F achieves a -4.37% return, which is significantly lower than GOLD's 26.44% return.
GC=F
- 1D
- 2.55%
- 1M
- 0.58%
- 6M
- -15.64%
- YTD
- -4.37%
- 1Y
- 22.59%
- 3Y*
- 28.72%
- 5Y*
- 18.04%
- 10Y*
- 11.96%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.04%
GOLD
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -2.96%
- 6M
- -18.31%
- YTD
- 26.44%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
GC=F Gold Futures | $47.40M | $22.54M | $17.66M |
| $14.68M | $15.39M | $19.00M |
GC=F vs. GOLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
GC=F Gold Futures | -4.37% | 2.04% |
GOLD Barrick Mining Corporation | 26.44% | 13.01% |
Correlation
The correlation between GC=F and GOLD is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 2, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
GC=F vs. GOLD — Risk / Return Rank
GC=F
GOLD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
GC=F vs. GOLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Gold Futures (GC=F) and Barrick Mining Corporation (GOLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| GC=F | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.97 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
GC=F vs. GOLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GC=F drawdown since its inception was -44.36%, which is greater than GOLD's maximum drawdown of -40.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GC=F and GOLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| GC=F | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.36% | -40.93% | -3.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.06% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.22% | -32.88% | +10.66% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.58% | -21.63% | +8.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.51% | — | — |
Volatility
GC=F vs. GOLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| GC=F | GOLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.61% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 28.24% | 55.30% | -27.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.70% | 55.30% | -36.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.68% | 55.30% | -38.62% |
Frequently Asked Questions
GC=F and GOLD have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for GC=F and GOLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer